Yes, sorry if I failed to explain things.
When there was a tie break the person who came second was a runner-up, otherwise there was only a winner. It sort of works because it shows that, if you were a runner up, you got the same votes (in the initial voting) as the winner. As we can see Teresa has been runner up twice and won once, so that has added to her high vote count (the 2nd highest after HB)
The scatter graph, which I think shows things best, shows that the further right you are the more votes you have got through the entire comp, but the higher up you are the more times you have entered. So some people like Digs, haven't entered as many times as others but has got a good amount of votes. That's why the bottom left of the graph is just a mess of names, because lots of people have entered once, twice or thrice, and picked up a few votes along the way.
The other scatter graph is trying to show more detail in the mid range because, as Mouse pointed out, names overlap and you can't read some of them.
The curved line is my attempt at a best fit, there was a straight line that intersected the Y-axis at just below 3, which meant that (on average) you have to enter 3 times to get a vote, but I felt the curve worked slightly better.
There is another graph that shows the entrants per month, the votes, the votees (the amount of people that received votes that month) and the % of votes that the winner received. It is interesting as it shows that some months there were fewer votes spread between more people. December 2010 will always be a bit of an outlier as we had 3 votes each.
I have the stats in spreadsheet form (but I use open office so it is a .ods file) and it shows that Mosaix had 25.58% of the votes in June 2011 which was the highest anybody got. If anyone wants a copy of my stats spreadsheet just let me know and I'll e-mail it over, one of you might be better at graphs and stats than I and be able to show more detailed info.