anivid
Planetary Guest
Not Necessarily - the two things do not need to be related, the artistic nature of a shot normally relies on the photographical technic (light/shadow etc.) and the artistic eye alone (placement of the motif in the viewfinder)Of course; but an unusual interpretation of the theme enhances the artistic nature of the shot.
As Mouse already stated it's normally not the equipment wich makes a chosen pic bad - the biggest error is as usual "the driver behind the wheel"When voting I tend to make allowances for shots taken with inexpensive equipment. It's a poor craftsman who blames the tools, of course; but a cheap digital camera is never going to produce crisp, quality photos. A photo can be artistic, without being technically excellent.
Agreed, Mouse.
See here we are again, it's a PHOTOGRAPHIC contest, Alex, not a litterary one, and definitely not a contest in finding odd ways in circumventing a problem.And I think that a quirky theme encourages an interesting array of unusual interpretations.
It's my nature, anyway, to seek out alternative routes around any thorny problem; which is my interpretation of the word "Challenge."
I'm all confused now about the theme of the month, wasn’t it about that particlar text in the form of a Nursery Rhyme ??
- when reading the comment of Alex it seems the presented text should lead to another Nursery Rhyme according to his choice ?? – and then (maybe ??) to a photo ??
Hope, pls. clarify.