Kissmequick
loony
Erm....?
Erm what? I've seen one or two places that specify they want them underlined. If they don't, they get them italicised.
Erm....?
So write in that and change when you sub - it only takes a few clicks.
I italicise italics, unless the subs guides say otherwise.
Sub guides trump everything else. They say send it in wing dings, they get wing dings!
Yep, that is what i do if they specify a font, but it knocks off where each new chapter starts line wise, ...
That's what i like about it.
I use page breaks but start each new chapter on line six, a third down by double paragraphing, as this gives room for comments, and this gets knocked off cos the font isn't exactly the same. Am i doing something really dense?
If you intend a word or phrase to appear in italics, the convention has long been to indicate this in your manuscript by underlining. This practice, too, is beginning to change. In Courier you should continue to underline, since italics in monospaced fonts are easy to overlook. In Times New Roman, though, it's becoming more and more acceptable to use italics directly. (Again, consult submission guidelines when you're in doubt.)