Thank you I, Brian!
I don't want to insult you. That being said, I probably didn't go the best way around it and of course: People has different tastes and a subjective reality.
Often people confuses when something is not to their to taste or method of reading, with a fault of someone else.
Even though people make faults.
There's a difference, when you say:
This is bad, meaningless, stupid, boring or ...
And saying:
This is not to my taste or my style of reading.
It's nothing personal with you I, Brian. I just felt some of the comments were a bit in that first direction
OT: I can only give you my opinion, but I don't feel that the Felurian part has much to do with: Outsexing a 1000 year old Goddess. The sex is not really even graphical, and the part is writing with a poetic prose to it, which is probably one of the reasons people find it boring. That's a taste. Saying it is bad is something else
It's not my favourite part, but I like the things it add to the plot, and I felt it was important to the story with foreshadowing, and development for Kvothe.
People often focus on the external great amount talent of Kvothes like fighting, magic, music etc. That's fair if you don't like it. Imo Kvothe is fun to read about because of his internal struggles and development. He might seem strong from a distance, but in a way I find him really human as he has a lot of personal weaknesses.
I find people with material faults and a beautiful mind more annoying to read about, than people with internal problems and strong abilities.
This is of course a question about taste.
Sorry for the wall of text!