I know, but I'm staying firmly focused on a small number of characters throughout it. I find too many epics tell a story about a world, rather than people. If I have to look online or in an index for what something means or who someone is, then I didn't care enough about it in the first place.
Ah, I see. Yeah, for me a story is made or broken on the strength of its characters. Why would I read about people I dislike? The same is true for any genre, not just epic. It just so happens that in epic, you have an epic scope as well - lots of races, places, peoples, and battles. Saying that, I can be bored by a book that has interesting characters doing very little. Balance balance balance!
And as much as some people say that the WoT has too big a cast list, I disagree; it's focused mainly on the group you met in book one, who grow and become so much more over the series (though I suppose you could say it's a slow growth; the series
is 14 books after all!). The huge cast list comes from side characters, and it's okay if you don't remember who they are. Anyway, as the primary characters meet others, occasional others will become lead POVs as well - but 9/10 of the series is about those we've grown to love. That's what makes it, for me, the closeness.
If I can stray off topic, what types of characters do you have in your series? A broad range from different countries/cities? Street urchins, noblemen, thieves, and the like, to give a broad view of society and how they interact? (That's the way I've chosen, plus an Earth girl, since there's a sort-of portal involved.)
Btw, I've been meaning to direct you to this series, since I think I remember your series involving a time portal:
The Many-Coloured Land: Saga of the Exiles: Book One: Saga of the Exiles: Book One. Trade Paperback Saga of the Exiles 1: Amazon.co.uk: Julian May: Books. Each book is about humans from the future going back in time to different ages - and book two has aliens and a faction who wants to wipeout humans! Even though the books look awesome, I've not read them, but I saw the striking covers in my local Waterstones once and the synopsis made me think of yours (if I remembered correctly).
So far as I understand it, this is from the Hebrew name for "Satan" as well. Though in that tradition, Satan is more like a prosecutor than anything else.
Yep. "Shaytan" or "Shaitan" (all Arabic) is derived from Hebrew "Satan", though I think Jordan chose the Arabic one so as not to give his series such a recognisable name. "Shaytan" means "whisperer" in Arabic, which I think suits Jordan's character more than Satan's verb-meaning would.
I am a slow reader. It will take awhile before I finish the book.
There's no rush. And like I say, you don't have to. I just love hearing others' opinions about the WoT.