I'm 41, and I'm sincerely hoping to get published in the next two years, through sheer hard work, determinism, and a willingness to take criticism.
I would have loved to have been published 10 years ago - BUT my work would be a lot stronger now - not simply because I understand a little more about writing, but also I have more life experience, and especially because I've done a lot more research. There's a whole wealth of detail I would be missing if I was published earlier, and IMO this can only make my current work much better.
There's some proper oldies here. Oh they're old. So ooooooold.
This is absolutely trueEDIT: 'life experience' isn't calculated by how old you are, it's thrust upon people of all ages.
There's some proper oldies here. Oh they're old. So ooooooold.
But there is a point that older people reach when it all starts to deteriorate! So I guess we have a peak age! I wonder what age that is?
I kinda feel like I stepped on toes. All I was asking for was whether or not I'm above the normal age for a debut writer. I certainly don't mean to imply that I'm "old" or call anyone else "old".
Age brings experience, Mouse. So don't knock it.
Yes greater age equals greater life experiences and does come in very useful. But there is a point that older people reach when it all starts to deteriorate! So I guess we have a peak age! I wonder what age that is?