Fried Egg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2006
- Messages
- 3,544
Yes! There's definitely a lot of humour in there anyway, if not an out-right comedy.I have just launched myself at The Worm Ouroboros by Eric R Eddison - is it supposed to be funny?
Yes! There's definitely a lot of humour in there anyway, if not an out-right comedy.I have just launched myself at The Worm Ouroboros by Eric R Eddison - is it supposed to be funny?
Yes! There's definitely a lot of humour in there anyway, if not an out-right comedy.
I loved Unwind, SirSamuelVimes, and I bought the next two. I haven't had the courage to read them yet -- I found sections of Unwind so intense they still give me (waking) nightmares.
Oh Good! because I laughed out loud at the phrase "the unvintaged sea" and the sequence where Gorice cheated at the 'wrastling' by shoving his fingers up his opponent's nose - and the spat of "Not fairs" that followed - had me giggling.
ADF started to write this as a standalone novel apparently, but two thirds of the way through his publisher convinced him to make it a Flinx book, so they appear late on! This is perhaps why it reads as a bit disjointed.Got bored with Alan Dean Foster's Bloodhype, just totally disconnected to the other books
[...]At the moment, I've been going through The Ghost Stories of Edith Wharton. So far, I've only read the first three: "The Lady's Maid's Bell", "The Eyes", and "Afterward". The last I've read before (in Great Tales of Terror and the Supernatural), but the other two I have not. Very well done; very understated; though the first two had rather less impact than I had expected from Wharton. I suppose with "The Eyes", it was that I had guessed the "secret" early on, which diminished any surprise there... yet this only very slightly diminished the satisfaction of the tale. In the case of both this and "The Lady's Maid's Bell", I think it was more that they felt a bit too conventional, even though they really aren't. Still, quite good; just not what I would put in the very first rank.
On the other hand, "Afterward", which is also quite subtle and understated, simply gets nastier on repeated readings. Once you know the "twist", the implications of what happens -- as well as what may have happened prior to the story -- becomes increasingly disturbing. Here she definitely hit the mark spot on....
It's been awhile since I read it, but I remember thinking "Afterward" very fine, indeed. I also have a memory of it reading very well in conjunction to "Pomegranate Seed," though I don't remember why I thought so at the time.
Randy M.
Bluestocking- I really enjoyed that King book. I dont think it was for everyone but it had me turning pages.
I'm still reading Scott Lynch - Republic of theives but am having a really hard time staying interested. Maybe because its been 5-6 years since the last one...I dont know...kind of dull. Im 200 pages in and nothjng much has happened..I do enjoy the flashbacks more than the story too.
It's not quite as good as the preceding books, for sure. I also enjoyed the flashback story better. There was one aspect of the book that annoyed me a bit, but I won't spoil anything for you. However, I'm still eagerly awaiting the next installment.
I finished my non-fiction read of From Dust to Life. Not as good as I had hoped, although still interesting.
Now I'm reading A Song of Achilles by Madeline Miller.