Roamer, I thought the same thing.
is there any moral issue?
Erm. I suppose this could be asked. Although I think what you really mean to ask is, is there a legal question, since no-one has been hurt.
There is certainly an ethical question, which again isn't quite the same.
Or at least should behave as if it does, initially as he changes his views?and more convinced that the Land really exists
My problem with Covenant was mostly about him being a whinny cry baby. His endless foot dragging. His failure to get with the program. Finally, his tormented, self flagellation which just goes on and on. Dudes a buzz kill.
I still think they are a brilliant book series (both of them) and admire Donaldson for the creation of them.
He was the weakest link yet, if he had been all powerful and mighty and standard super-hero type, would the books have been as good as they were? Wasn't it the contrast between his Land powers and his sense of self from the 'real' world that made the whole thing so compelling?The world he created was fantastic. I based a 3 year D&D campaign on a version of the place. He used ideas from several other fantasy writers but he made them his own. I guess that's part of why I feel so let down by Thomas Covenant. He was the weakest link.