*SPOILERS FOR S3E13*
Eee, I did enjoy that!
Jumping right in: Alec was not quite the "cataclysmic time anomaly" you were looking for. Well... Original Alec's jump did put in motion the events that lead to Escher's death, which opened the door for Kellog to take control of Piron, but at the end of the day, Kellog was the threat, not Paranoid Alec (as Emily/Maya calls him) and Halo. Did not see that coming... which I kind of think we should - right from the very first episode of the third series, Kellog has been scheming to get on top. He didn't know at the time that Alec would inherit Piron, but we've seen how quick he is on his feet. And twenty-five years in the future, Clan Leader Kellog is still scheming, sending Brad Tonkin back in time with a mission that Kellog knows will help 2014 Kellog's cause. That is cold.
I think we can safely say that the writers aren't going to try and pull the old 'evil doppelganger masquerading as the good doppelganger' card. The surviving Alec didn't have the RFID chip (do Americans/Canadians really pronounce it "arfid", rather than spelling it out?), he changed office, and he didn't try and fight Kellog - PAlec obviously had the chip, would have stayed in his lab, and would have fought Kellog and vowed to destroy him. In some shows it works, and in some it doesn't. I don't think it would work in
Continuum.
I can't make up my mind as to whether I'm shocked by Kiera's change of heart. The foundations of her character are built on her wanting Big Brother to succeed, so she can be reunited with her son. It's a short list the people who are rooting for Big Brother, but we can ignore that part of her because her goal is to get back to her son. The character has definitely changed over the past two years, and she's been thinking with a clarity that wasn't possible in 2077 (hey, that flashbackforward episode is starting to make sense!), but has she really changed to the point where she would sacrifice her only reason for continuing in 2012 for the greater good? Does Brad really mean that much to her that she would choose him and a possible future over Sam and her future?
And finally, Continuum has it's very own Brotherhood of Steel. Cool!
We're going to have to go back to the drawing boards to determine which timeline they're from, and what that means for the current timeline**, but I'm glad to see that the writers are totally committed to what they've already written.
Simon Barry thinks we'll hear about a renewal in July, which would be good, because I'm excited to see the possibilities that await us in the fourth series of
Fallout Continuum: The Sarah Connor Chronicles. I wonder how the fact that two whole TTDs, a 2014-engineered TTD segment, and a time beacon are in play is going to affect things moving forwards. Any up for setting the beacon in 2014 as a home base, and using the TTDs (and maybe engineering more whole ones?) to jump around to see what's cracking?
**For the record, I, er... don't know. My gut feeling, based on my interpretation, is that our armoured friends are from Brad's original timeline (going back to my diagram:
T2), having jumped between timelines the same way Kiera did at the start of the series, and that the future of
T3 is still in flux, in which case, Brad's assumption that nothing responding to the beacon is a good sign is wrong. Horribly wrong.
Either that, or what we see when the soldiers arrive is the beginning of
T4 - off-camera, Brad set off the beacon in
T3, nothing happened, and time continues to 2039, where the technology is developed to 'hear' the beacon. The signal is picked up, and soldiers jump back to when the beacon is activated. Their jump creates a new timeline,
T4, which is picked up on camera immediately following the jump.
The question then is: is Brad an unreliable narrator with the wrong idea about time travel (I think his assumption is that time is a single, dynamic timeline, that he went back to a point on the same line, and that any changes he makes change the future... hence the idea that he can "prove" change with the beacon), not realising that his old timeline still exists and that the beacon will be picked up by them, or are the Freelancers wrong with their ideas about time travel being a branching tree? Of course, throw in the idea that timelines die and are replaced by newly created timelines, and a whole extra level of complexity is added!
Because it's so much easier to follow, I'm going to interpret it as the soldiers turning up in
T3 from
T2. It sucks that Brad might have doomed this timeline with his incorrect notions, but that is price we have to pay. That said, in my interpretation, the show has already done an off-camera timeline with
T2, so having T3 play out off-camera isn't beyond the realms of possibility, and I like the idea of following existing examples.