WinterLight
In the marshes
Thinking on the question I am struggling to recall excerpts or references of explanations that have 'annoyed' me - I suppose if they cannot suspend my disbelief they just don't belong in my memory banks.
But this got me thinking that if an author is telling a tale it is often more believable when they skirt casually over the technology as if it is a now mundane part of everyday life in their fiction. This way the hows and whats can be left to the best storyteller of all, our own imaginations.
Even so if the author is intending on digging a bit deeper, I am no physician but plausibility is present only if what is being explained can be understood. It needs grounding in the real world to be able to relate, otherwise even if there is a genius invention hiding behind the words it might as well be space magic.
Some day it might require less and less knowledge to operate a space ship.
But this got me thinking that if an author is telling a tale it is often more believable when they skirt casually over the technology as if it is a now mundane part of everyday life in their fiction. This way the hows and whats can be left to the best storyteller of all, our own imaginations.
Even so if the author is intending on digging a bit deeper, I am no physician but plausibility is present only if what is being explained can be understood. It needs grounding in the real world to be able to relate, otherwise even if there is a genius invention hiding behind the words it might as well be space magic.