The best source I could find is this: http://history.nasa.gov/CP-2156/ch5.4.htm
Interesting but that article seems a lot more optimistic about the ability to detect tv and radio than SETI are. Another problem I have is how short a duration such wide broadcasting will have. We only started at the turn of the century and my guess is that within another 50 years max we won't be so wasteful - I think there will soon be very little broadcast that isn't either short range (mobile phones etc.) or tight beamed (to satellite) or beamed from satellite to Earth, or solid (cable, optic etc.) ie. not really detectable at any distance. Assuming we are typical then the window when we (or other races) are detectable is going to be very small and thus chances of listening at just the right time very slim. Believe me I want to be more enthusiastic about the chances but...
Mirannan, I hadn't realised Fermi had been so specific; it really isn't a paradox then. It's only a paradox if we make the assumption that that is how aliens are going to behave, ie. sending out self-replicating drones. The answer to the 'paradox' is therefore that, clearly, one of the assumptions is wrong; the drones assumption or the assumption that, since we exist and the galaxy/universe is so big, there must be loads of others like us out there. It can only be a paradox if the conditions are known absolutes rather than assumptions.
Wasn't it in Poul Anderson's Boast of a Million Years that he suggests humanity's future is ultimately one of boredom in the far future once all of Physics' secrets have been discovered? So yes still having plenty of unknowns is great!3) Perhaps most importantly, it's brilliant for us SF writers