Which to or too?

Hi,

Oops! Should have read the other posts more closely! But now I'm wondering having read your last post why there are asses in the church. Saint Francis' Day?

Cheers, Greg.
 
psychotick said:
Hi,

Oops! Should have read the other posts more closely! But now I'm wondering having read your last post why there are asses in the church. Saint Francis' Day?
Cheers, Greg.
Click to expand...

It's WWI and artillery bombardment can be heard. The town except for the two farmers has evacuated. The service is being taken by an army chaplain with only five soldiers in attendance plus the two farmers. The church has a few broken windows and evidence of being hit. I suspect the asses are in church to keep them safe. In reality it is because to show them outside would double the cost of the episode so I've made having them inside as believable as I can.
 
I understand an episode of a comedy that is shot entirely inside or entirely outside will be around £150K one which uses both on location and studio is around £300K. The less my comedy costs to produce the better chance it has of being commissioned.
 
Too may be used for also; as well. Or is that too much information?

I think that: Who to the Germans; as: Who to, the Germans; sounds like the first thing that came to mind.
Where any of the others with a longer pause sounds almost done for comedic effect.
Who to: the Germans?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top