the site used to **** words like B******d for us - does the new one not do it?
I don't want to seem a prude - anyone who has read my books can account for my use of the good old Ulster venacular with its myriad swear words. But I often question the need for them in 75 words and most of the ones used this month could have been replaced I think (bar one entry, which was using a particular voice and which was mild, anyway.) I think if you look at something like Alc's entry, it's easy to see that the tone can be kept (I just bet that Gran has a word or two she knows...) without the need to take it further and it's more effective for it. But it's not just language but imagery - again, we're writers and should be able to convey subtlety without the need for gore? (Says me who wrote a 300 from the mind of a serial killer....)
I don't want to seem a prude - anyone who has read my books can account for my use of the good old Ulster venacular with its myriad swear words. But I often question the need for them in 75 words and most of the ones used this month could have been replaced I think (bar one entry, which was using a particular voice and which was mild, anyway.) I think if you look at something like Alc's entry, it's easy to see that the tone can be kept (I just bet that Gran has a word or two she knows...) without the need to take it further and it's more effective for it. But it's not just language but imagery - again, we're writers and should be able to convey subtlety without the need for gore? (Says me who wrote a 300 from the mind of a serial killer....)