It was an easy read, but really bad. Still, anything that makes Millions of people pick up a book, regardless of what I think, can’t be a bad thing.
I can’t criticise though. I liked Brian Herbert’s Dune sequels.
At least you're honest.I can’t criticise though. I liked Brian Herbert’s Dune sequels.
I'll also admit to having enjoyed the Da Vinci Code. Good romp. I still have it somewhere, though it's not the kind of book you re-read - but that's a genre thing rather than a quality thing I think.
Critics don't seem to care much for Alan Dean Foster, but he's one of my favourite SF writers.
I would imagine his critics are mostly judgmental of his movie novelisations.
I don't know. In many cases his novelisations were as good as the films. And in a few cases better.I would imagine his critics are mostly judgmental of his movie novelisations.
Most of the time better than the original film.I would imagine his critics are mostly judgmental of his movie novelisations.
Its certainly a shame ADF was never recognised award-wise back in the day. He has no chance now of course (old straight white guy), but he's still writing very good SF. Relic (2018) was very good.
He was awarded the 2008 Grandmaster Award by the International Association of Media Tie-In Writers.Is there any kind of Lifetime achievement award in Literature ? He deserves something.
Unfortunately he doesn’t tick the right boxes...He could be given the Damon Knight Grand Master Award.
Les Miserables was widely panned and even referred to as infantile when it was first released. The other common answer is the Twilight series. I have never read them, but the critical and general panning of them was drowned out by the copies sold.