Writing groups - experiences of/thoughts about/requests for?

It seems that writer's groups, from reading the posts here, are really only useful for emotional support and possibly confidence building.
They are good for that, but if that's what you've taken from the replies here, then, with all due respect, you've not read them right.

I can imagine that if I join my local group (full of professional writers) ... and yet if I a group of inexperienced writers...
Those are opposite extremes. It's possible to be an experienced writer, in that one has been doing it for several years, without being a professional. I know for a fact there are at least two people holding MAs in Creative Writing who've contributed to this thread, whose insights in both the micro and macro level are invaluable. Look around to see if there is a group whose writing level matches your own.

... [from] inexperienced writers, the advice and feedback may not be of any use, given that it may well be incorrect or poorly given. Writing tends to be very subjective at the best of times and I think other than pointing out plot flaws or weak characters, it is not likely that good critique can be given.
I'd suggest you have a look at our Critiques section to see how incredibly helpful critiques can be given by non-professionals just on the basis of seeing a maximum of 1500 words. As and when you reach 30 posts you can also put up some of your own work there (always provided it hasn't been published already) and see what help can be given.
 
Think of it like a D&D party.

Geeks? Us?

I probably wouldn't have been published if it wasn't for the writing group I joined: if I would have been pulbished, it would have been a lot later on.
 
A writing group is useful for the questions they ask and for seeing the things you can't see yourself. Sometimes you have perfectly good answers and sometimes (as with many of alc's questions, curse him) they are precisely the questions that agents ask too.

Like most mortals, I can't write as quickly as springs (could anyone have guessed?!) and I agree it's good to work with a group where you have the same expectations about how much gets critted every week!

I think that writing groups can be very useful for discipline -- I used to know I had to write 5,000 words or so every week, and that kept me working even when life was busy and there were other things I ought to have been doing.

I am also in two minds about writing with a group -- for one of my stories it worked very well, for the next perhaps not so well. I think there is a balance between getting feedback as you write, and changing the story to fit in with what your writing group says.

Basically, like developmental editing, writing groups train you faster than if you write alone. You need to find a good one and it needs to work for you (I kissed a lot of critters before... etc etc) but nothing else can replace having serious and committed writers comment on your manuscript.
 
Uhh, yeah, I'm confused as to why someone would think writing groups are just there for emotional support? And confidence building? Most posts I've read on this thread point to learning through critique (from others AND from offering critique themselves).

So, color me a little baffled.

If you don't want to join a group because you're afraid you'll be "ripped to shreds," then I would probably avoid it if it will cause great stress. I've been in situations where my work has been completely destroyed by others. That is never helpful and I do not repeat those situations if I can help it. What I have done is collected a handful of amazing writers and GREAT critiquers who see what I'm trying to do and help me do it well. And they call me out on my s**t (nicely). And they give me amazing direction and advice. I probably spend 2 hours going over their notes and revising. Sometimes more.

The only "emotional" thing that comes out of it is a want to make my work as print-ready as I possibly can and enjoying time with people I have something in common with.
 
I've never had/been in a writing group and I'm doing all right. I have lots of betas and other support instead. You don't need a writing group. You do need other people.
 
Thanks for the input everyone. I have been toying with the idea of joining a writer's group and wondering which one would be best (if at all). It seems that writer's groups, from reading the posts here, are really only useful for emotional support and possibly confidence building. I can imagine that if I join my local group (full of professional writers) I would get ripped to shreds just for the audacity of attending and yet if I a group of inexperienced writers, the advice and feedback may not be of any use, given that it may well be incorrect or poorly given.

Not sure how you could have gotten that from anything I said. There are all kinds of groups, from the ones that only puff up each other's egos to the ones that rip each other to shreds.

But when I attended the meeting where the members went at the work tooth and claw, it was the same with everybody's writing, professional and non-professional alike. So no one was being punished for their audacity in attending.

And in the group I stayed with, there were few already published writers over the years, but most of the members that had not been published had been writing for a long time, and were intent on learning their craft. I learned a lot from them. They did offer support where it was needed (but sometimes "support" means supporting your goals by offering constructive criticism so you will improve). Occasionally, writers who were complete novices would join, and it was frustrating critiquing their work if they were very bad and they kept making the same mistakes over and over and over, but I don't believe that ever came through in the critiques. Reviews had to be constructive, and no one was impolite or unkind. With such people, I believe we all tried not to give them more advice than they could absorb or make use of at one time.

I guess it depends on what you mean by shredding your work. If it means being thorough and pointing out all the flaws, yes, that might happen in any good group. It wouldn't be any sort of punishment for audacity (although perhaps you didn't mean that the way it sounded), it would be because members of the group thought that was the best way for you to learn. Personally, I think that critiques that are too scathing are counter-productive, which is why I never went back to the group that specialized in that kind of review. A critique can be thorough without being mean.

But no one needs to join a writers group in order to learn how to write. As I said, I sold my first book before I joined one, and I think only let three people ever have a look at the book while it was in progress (and they were readers, not writers). I knew I wasn't ready to handle criticism, so I didn't seek it out. When I was confident enough to face it and was also longing for the fellowship of other writers the right group came along at just the right time.

But there was no internet in those days. The choices were few. Had I friends who were also writers but who lived a great distance away, I might have done the Victorian thing and exchanged long letters. But I didn't, so it was either join a group or go it alone. Now it is possible to get the support and to learn from other writers in forums like this one, without ever showing them your work. Although you will learn more if you eventually do get some critiques.

I do strongly recommend that those seeking advice look first for a good writers group before they make the decision to pay for a professional editor. Which may seem strange, since I am, myself, a freelance developmental editor these days. But if you can find a good one , I think a writers group should be the first step (and maybe all you will need). If you can't find or start one in your area, or would prefer something one-on-one, or feel that your group has taken you as far as they can with a specific manuscript, then you might want to look for a professional editor if you can afford one.

There are just so many ways now to learn, get encouragement and support, make friends with other writers, that you can choose what seems best for you ... and when that no longer seems the best way, you can do something else.
 
I guess it depends on what you mean by shredding your work. If it means being thorough and pointing out all the flaws, yes, that might happen in any good group. It wouldn't be any sort of punishment for audacity (although perhaps you didn't mean that the way it sounded), it would be because members of the group thought that was the best way for you to learn. Personally, I think that critiques that are too scathing are counter-productive, which is why I never went back to the group that specialized in that kind of review. A critique can be thorough without being mean.

I expect my group members to pick up on issues, but they're never scathing and awful about it. People who tear others down and get jollies from it are sadistic. If you can't critique diplomatically and without being a complete jerkbutt, then stop. Just stop. You might accidentally hit one target out of tens of thousands, but even a blind pig can find an acorn now and then.

***Let me be clear: there is a difference between offering up constructive criticism that is helpful--and--being a bully. Let me also state that some people are overly sensitive and will take constructive criticism as being "too harsh." To them, I'd suggest getting out of the writing business as you will never be free of criticism. Or, self-publish and do not rely on an editor. And don't read any reviews. Ever. But for the most part? There is a difference between:

1. This sucks. Why are you a writer? This is the worst crap I've ever read. It makes no sense and I hate it.

and

2. The story has a very compelling premise, but I'm not getting the main character's motivation right now. Your dialogue is great in chapter 2, but kind of gets a little stilted in chapter 3. Blah blah....

But no one needs to join a writers group in order to learn how to write. As I said, I sold my first book before I joined one, and I think only let three people ever have a look at the book while it was in progress (and they were readers, not writers). I knew I wasn't ready to handle criticism, so I didn't seek it out. When I was confident enough to face it and was also longing for the fellowship of other writers the right group came along at just the right time.

I too published before I ever joined a writing group or took a class of any kind. Learned a LOT from that experience, but reached a point where I needed peer feedback. I had to learn HOW to critique as well and how to weed through multiple critiques. It comes with practice.

I do strongly recommend that those seeking advice look first for a good writers group before they make the decision to pay for a professional editor. Which may seem strange, since I am, myself, a freelance developmental editor these days. But if you can find a good one , I think a writers group should be the first step (and maybe all you will need).

Agreeing so hard with this. I pretty much hit all of my editing needs with a single run-through with the writing group. Though we don't ask others to focus on grammar or syntax, between the four of them, enough gets to me that I can make some great edits for clarity and such. And I learn from them as well. I'm a better grammar goddess now than I was before I started the group. Then again, we never discuss grammar or syntax in our face-to-face sessions. We just mark it on the manuscript. I can't tell you how thankful I am for those notes.

And all of this conversation doesn't even touch on the networking you can do through writing groups. Friends-of-friends and pals-of-pals? I have two agents who I met this way who are eager to see a full manuscripts when I'm finished.
 
Yes, writing groups can be good for networking.* And also sharing resources.

_____
*Seminars and workshops can also be good for that. Networking means go where other writers go. Writing groups, conventions, even book signings or readings by an author, if it isn't someone with such a big name you'll only have ten seconds with them while they sign your book. A writers group is where you make the friends who will go with you to these other things and lend you moral support when you are meeting new people.
 
It seems that writer's groups, from reading the posts here, are really only useful for emotional support and possibly confidence building.

And making friends with similar aims, getting out of the stuffy four walled usualness. (I appreciate some of us introverts need that incubation!) I find ideas come from these places. They connect smudgy dots. Not "book feed back" but passing comments that develop into stories of their own. Talking to someone about what a nightmare they had in traffic getting to the group has connected plot points in stories I've been working on. A Romance author discussing her trials with getting a story into a magazine provided an angle for another character I was working on. Seeing life through other people rounds your characters off.
 
I've been in one virtual writing group, which I still miss - members of the Chrons - and I'm still in a local writing group, where we meet each week.

I found the online writing group a tremendous help and we are still in touch for support and discussion. Like Hex, it pushed me to write/edit, knowing I had a target to reach each week, but I think it is important to have belief in your own story, or it can get altered in a desire to please the group - you need to be sure it's what you want to do. I have no doubt the virtual group took my writing to a higher level, which I'd not have achieved. And the slight change of direction my story has taken is the correct one, even if I wasn't completely convinced at the time. :)

The local group - a wonderful group of people who have turned into friends. Unfortunately we are more like a coffee morning than a writing group. But reading out work every week has a lot of benefits, as it highlights to yourself problems that might not have been noticed otherwise. And ideas can be suggested which are very useful.
 
OK, the Chrons has too many interesting threads and it's impossible to keep up with them all. I always seem to be stumbling upon discussions long after they were started. But I guess, as long as it's still an open thread, it's possible to comment.... Ha ha!

My first exposure to a writing critique environment was in college, in creative writing classes and literature classes where we all sat around and discussed the great works of... big long list of you name it, I read it. So when I joined my first actual writer's group, I applied the same literary analysis approach.

what stopped us operating as a formal writing group in the end, I think, was pacing. I had a much bigger output than the others in the group, and more time to crit etc, and was getting frustrated at the lack of (a very reasonable, as it happens) pace, which, in turn, put pressure on others to do more than they had time to. Also, some of us weren't working on active wips for a while, so there was an imbalance in terms of what each got from it

Jo, I know exactly what you're talking about a slow pace. I think we're alike in the ability to produce lots of new pages in pretty short order. I've had a similar frustration in my current group. They have a set schedule of reviewing one person's work at a time, every 2 weeks, at a cap of around 7,500 words. In my previous groups over the years, we would read multiple submissions in each session so we managed to get through a lot more material. In this one, at least 4 of us actively have a WIP, that means I would only be able to submit a piece every 8 weeks. I calculated that an average novel of 90K divided into 12 installments would take almost two years to cycle through. By that time, I've forgotten why I started writing the novel in the first place! I've pulled out a couple of mss halfway into the comments when I felt the plot collapsing in my head like a house of cards. We discussed my concerns in emails and in video group chats, but it's weird to be the only one who felt exasperated by this lengthy fragmented schedule. I'm sorry to say that I've semi-withdrawn, although I pop in from time to time with a short story.
 
I can share such complaints, and I've also semi-withdrawn from my own group. I in fact stopped going altogether for quite awhile.

My local writing group meets at a café every second Sunday afternoon, and sometimes even then its a bit hit and miss, but only two of us there appear to be taking writing seriously. The rest are using the meetings as a social outing. It makes it hard for me to get any feedback from them. I show up, have material I'd love them to read and comment on, but all they want to do is drink coffee and chat about other things in their lives, mainly because they don't have any material of their own to share.
 
I can share such complaints, and I've also semi-withdrawn from my own group. I in fact stopped going altogether for quite awhile.

My local writing group meets at a café every second Sunday afternoon, and sometimes even then its a bit hit and miss, but only two of us there appear to be taking writing seriously. The rest are using the meetings as a social outing. It makes it hard for me to get any feedback from them. I show up, have material I'd love them to read and comment on, but all they want to do is drink coffee and chat about other things in their lives, mainly because they don't have any material of their own to share.

Yep Warren, been there done that. But not for long. If these people want a social club then call it a social club NOT writing club. Snotty nosed ego maniacs inhabited one such 'group' I attended and they were beside themselves with patronizing amusement when I mentioned I wrote science fiction. I didn't last the first hour. As I packed up to go, one over aged, under experienced cretin asked, "Where are you going?" "Elsewhere," I responded. "Why are you leaving our group," she asked. She had to ask, didn't she? "Because Madam," I said, "I find you and your group to be a major pain in my ar*e." Oddly enough, no one in this so called 'writing group' could come up with a retort. But, I guess you get that.
 
Interestingly me 1st group is now back up and running and I find the 2k a fortnight offered fine. I don't need every scene teethied, although my first draft is very slowly going out (been about three months since the last time.) also, we have a new member and she was a member of my 2nd group, so that was nice karma.

But it's all very relaxed now. We are committed writers (well, one is slacking off at the moment, but since we're all begging to see what happens next, hopefully not for long ;)), and that helps, but we also have good craic.

And when a beta came up with some lovely fab ideas for book two and me having to get the changes made and betaed, it's to the writing group I crawl and plead and some were lovely enough (and not on hols) to look at it for me.
 
I just discovered there is a writing group in Limerick. A real one, not an online thingy.
But I hate clubs, socialising, being polite etc ...
 

Similar threads


Back
Top