Yeah, I watched about half of the Thunderbirds and Captain Scarlet CGI series, and they both seemed like reasonable modern reimaginings of the shows. Unlike the god-awful movie.
The 2004 film had the right look, buts thats all it had.
Yeah, I watched about half of the Thunderbirds and Captain Scarlet CGI series, and they both seemed like reasonable modern reimaginings of the shows. Unlike the god-awful movie.
If that was true, they wouldn't have screwed up Star Wars as badly as they did. They didn't even have to write new movies, they could just have adapted the existing books and watched the money roll in.
The problem is that, when they don't take the safe bet, they take the batcrap crazy bet ('come on, the fans will love us killing off all the old characters for no good reason. And they can never get enough Death Stars').
The 2004 film had the right look, buts thats all it had.
I actually like the Abraham Star Ward film andI liked Rogue one and Solo way better then then those crappy CGI driven Prequel monstrosities that Lucas did.
If I remember correctly, the director said he'd never even seen the TV show when he made the movie.
Now that's what I call damning with faint praise .
What we need is a Space: 1999 film series.
Space: 2099. There's your change.
No. Please, no.
Monster.And there will be transformers in it .
If the music industry was anything like the movie industry, all we'd get is covers
It's also interesting how many movies are now based on books - I'm not sure if the figure has ever been this high, or just whether it's always been that way and I'm just noticing more nowadays.