ralphkern
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2013
- Messages
- 1,156
I must say, I'm not a fan of the interview. In principle, it's a nice idea, but effectively you're saying:
The start of this novel is a bit weak, but give it a go and read the rest, you'll like it.
"I was so self-conscious about properly introducing the characters and world that I don't think the opening chapters flow as naturally and confidently as later ones."
Then to compound that, you're saying. You may think this book is weak compared to the later, but go on, give them a go, you might like them.
"Although I've worked with my editors to produce the best book possible, it doesn't have the emotional highs and lows that are coming in the series. So I'd say GATHERING is great, but the next books are better!"
I'm not even a huge fan of saying how long this took you to write as well. Are readers going to wonder they won't get Book 2 until 2036?
IMHO, I'd remove it, or have more positive questions in the IV.
The start of this novel is a bit weak, but give it a go and read the rest, you'll like it.
"I was so self-conscious about properly introducing the characters and world that I don't think the opening chapters flow as naturally and confidently as later ones."
Then to compound that, you're saying. You may think this book is weak compared to the later, but go on, give them a go, you might like them.
"Although I've worked with my editors to produce the best book possible, it doesn't have the emotional highs and lows that are coming in the series. So I'd say GATHERING is great, but the next books are better!"
I'm not even a huge fan of saying how long this took you to write as well. Are readers going to wonder they won't get Book 2 until 2036?
IMHO, I'd remove it, or have more positive questions in the IV.