Blade Runner 2049 (2017) (No Spoilers Thread)

Well, I've been convinced by the comments here, and by other reviews, including a gushing one by the BBC this morning, that I should, at the very least, see this, and that I must watch it in a cinema. Unfortunately, I doubt I'll get the time. I am surprised that only @MontyCircus dislikes it after having seen it. Either it really, really is as good as the BBC thinks, or people are too afraid to say anything about the Emperor's New Clothes. I'm hoping it is the former, if I do go.
 
Apparently, the producers and studio are very disappointed with the first weekend figures. Very few women and few young people are going to see this. It is mainly older men who have seen the original film. Some people are blaming the depiction of women within the film, but I really can't see how you would know that before you had watched it?? So, surely the blame, if any, can only be placed upon the promotion of the film. As far as I can see, it is getting great reviews and critical acclaim from all corners. It is also difficult for me to say more without having watched it myself, but I thought it just seems odd.
 
With it being a sequel to a 35 year old film it is not so surprising that the showings are not full of young people. Plus the original was not really action packed or with a lot of romantic drama, which tends to pull people in.
 
Apparently, the producers and studio are very disappointed with the first weekend figures. Very few women and few young people are going to see this. It is mainly older men who have seen the original film. Some people are blaming the depiction of women within the film, but I really can't see how you would know that before you had watched it?? So, surely the blame, if any, can only be placed upon the promotion of the film. As far as I can see, it is getting great reviews and critical acclaim from all corners. It is also difficult for me to say more without having watched it myself, but I thought it just seems odd.

I don't think young people in the US can see it. I think it's got an R rating meaning no one under 18.

Also at nearly three hours, a lot of people might be put off by its length. Many people don't have the attention span to watch a film that long.
 
Well, I've been convinced by the comments here, and by other reviews, including a gushing one by the BBC this morning, that I should, at the very least, see this, and that I must watch it in a cinema. Unfortunately, I doubt I'll get the time. I am surprised that only @MontyCircus dislikes it after having seen it. Either it really, really is as good as the BBC thinks, or people are too afraid to say anything about the Emperor's New Clothes. I'm hoping it is the former, if I do go.

The critics loved it, as according to RottenTomatoes scores it should end up in the top 5 or 10 critically acclaimed films of the year.

First night audiences gave it a CinemaScore "A-" which is what I'd call "very good" (though keep in mind, the 2 other wide-releases of the weekend also received an "A-" from their audiences, for The Mountain Between Us and My Little Pony: The Movie).

Finally, there's the IMDB score, which currently places it as the 50th best movie of all-time.

Those are the metrics that I follow, and all signs are positive. It's true, I'm not a fan. But I didn't like the original either (so what do I know?). Therefore I would only recommend that if you didn't like the original that you probably won't like 2049.

Apparently, the producers and studio are very disappointed with the first weekend figures. Very few women and few young people are going to see this. It is mainly older men who have seen the original film. Some people are blaming the depiction of women within the film, but I really can't see how you would know that before you had watched it?? So, surely the blame, if any, can only be placed upon the promotion of the film. As far as I can see, it is getting great reviews and critical acclaim from all corners. It is also difficult for me to say more without having watched it myself, but I thought it just seems odd.

My sister recently saw the original. She's decidedly not a science fiction fan. Her reaction was something like: "Darryl Hannah's doing flips? What the hell? Are they serious?"

I think they assumed Gosling would bring in some women, as he's a huge heart-throb. I've heard that he actually turned down the opportunity to be named People magazine's "Sexiest Man Alive", on multiple occasions.

At any rate, it didn't work, as the headlines were "Blade Runner Bombs", "Struggles", "Flops", etc. I went to the first showing on the opening night Thursday IMAX showing in my city. There were only 2 other people in our row. That's like 30 empty seats, per row, in the very place and time you would expect that the die-hard fans would congregate. It seems very unlikely that it will break-even. I've heard its production costs are between $150-170 million, so it would need around $300 worldwide, and it looks doubtful.
 
Last edited:
Watched this movie over the weekend. It was my daughters birthday, we go to movies to celebrate oddly enough this time at a celebration theatre. She chose the movie and in fact I had miss-laid my brain somewhere while not realizing the movie was just now released here. She, on the other hand, had gone out of her way to re-watch the original to be properly refreshed before watching the sequel.

We got to the theatre ten minutes before the showing and were told we couldn't get in; but it wasn't that they were sold out and we sat with the manager for a bit while he apologized because there were technical difficulties in that theatre. After waiting until after the movie time the manager gave us a free pass and we continued to wait another hour to get into the next theatre with the movie. So barring the popcorn and soda's we got in free.

Without giving spoilers I would have to say that it was enjoyable; however I have to admit that there were several moments that I was reminded of the movie Cherry 2000 with Melanie Griffith, which I would say was not a good thing. Barring that one glitch the movie was well done, though I could say that the feel and sound of the movie was almost too much like the first and that could mar it for some people as it seemed as though they went too far to recapture what they had in the first movie.

My daughter's first observation was right on target with consensus so far; "There are very few women in this theatre."
 
I will leave spoilers to the other thread but I went to watch 2049 yesterday. It was very good, and is a suitable follow up to the original. Very impressive scenes, graphics and set design. Lots of positives though I do think the story was a bit on the slow side and they could have had at least one more action scene in there somewhere to liven it up.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top