- Joined
- Jan 22, 2008
- Messages
- 8,072
To go off topic somewhat here, I know that if I self-published, my books would probably disappear. To be noticed, I'd have to put in a huge amount of time and effort (which I don't have) and do loads of self-publicity (which I don't have any inclination towards). And then, on top of all of that, there's the issue of luck. And the suspicion that a lot of what you hear from both sides of the argument are horror stories or unusual successes. The model is slanted towards people who have the free time, money and charisma that comes from being well-off before they even started.
One advantage with the standard model is that, once the contract is concluded and the books printed, the author's work is largely done. Of course, it sometimes doesn't work out that way, but that is the standard towards which things are meant to go. Which is not to say that self-publishing is a bad idea, just that, as far as producing a good book that is recognised as such and/or makes some money, it's got its flaws too. I think a lot would depend on the individual writer and their objectives.
One advantage with the standard model is that, once the contract is concluded and the books printed, the author's work is largely done. Of course, it sometimes doesn't work out that way, but that is the standard towards which things are meant to go. Which is not to say that self-publishing is a bad idea, just that, as far as producing a good book that is recognised as such and/or makes some money, it's got its flaws too. I think a lot would depend on the individual writer and their objectives.