Alex The G and T
Thar! That Blows.
Around here:
more than one fez is know as a convention of shriners.
Ah, the fez's brigade; because they belong to their fezzes.
Around here:
more than one fez is know as a convention of shriners.
Now I'm curious as to what you're subterfuging!
No. Well, not at present. "Subterfuge" is a noun, and while English has a long and glorious history of creating verbs from nouns, that one hasn't gained legitimate status yet (not even in Merriam-Webster ) so if you want a verb it would be something like "engaged in subterfuge".Is that a real word - subterfuging?
Mine doesn't! Though my paper copy is getting on a bit, admittedly. I can't find it as a legitimate verb on the usual online dictionaries though. Admit it, CC, you just invented it and you want to convince us it's kosher so we all use it and you bask in the glow of being its originator!!I wrote it without pause (a good sign for it being a real word), then stopped to reconsider it. Oxford dictionary accepts it...
what about super-fudging ?
which would work in a twisted way.(as yet!!)
I think if a hat is a fez, it is gilding the lily to call it "fez-style." You would not call a Ford automobile a "Ford-style automobile."You know, it came to me that we'd solved the particular sentence you put forth, dannymcg, but I wondered if we helped make the sentence better...smoother.
"They all donned fez-style hats." seems a bit awkward to me. Earlier you'd been wanting to use the plural of 'fez', so it makes me think these are actual fezzes they are donning, not just hats that resemble fezzes in style (if you see what I mean).
I wonder too if this is part of a longer sentence...'They all donned fez-style hats, and the meeting began.' (for example). It's not very smooth, with 'fez-style'.
You could say: 'Each donned a fez, and the meeting began.' or simply 'Each member donned a fez.' This way you remove the plural, and, perhaps, create a smoother-reading sentence.
I subterfuge, you subterfuge, he subterfuges.I will admit to many things, and one of them is writing sometimes too closely to how I speak. So, while I might try to bamboozle people in speech with words that do not (as yet!!) exist, I should never do so in posting on a site frequented by so many erudite people. (It would be a cool verb, though!)
That's what you tell the guy building you an ice cream sundae...That sounds mildly rude,
"Carry On Fudging"
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
J | Plural Possessive 's s's too many sss | Grammar & Spelling | 12 | |
Pluralities | Grammar & Spelling | 22 | ||
Plural for Cerberus | Grammar & Spelling | 10 | ||
When to use a singular or plural noun for a group? | Grammar & Spelling | 7 | ||
The plural of gruffalo/Is lamppost two words? | Writing Discussion | 32 |