Historical Urban Fantasy?

Teresa Edgerton

Goblin Princess
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Nov 1, 2004
Messages
15,844
Location
California
So my first panel at BayCon this Friday is Historical Urban Fantasy. Unlike some of the other panels there is no blurb for this panel, so no guidance on where they would like to see us take this discussion. I hate when that happens, because I like to be prepared. I rather suspect the best we will be able to do is throw around the names of some authors and the titles of some books.

Well, I can think of quite a few that might fit that category, but they are all Steampunk or Gaslight. There may be others I have read, but I am drawing a blank at the moment.

Anyone with any suggestions for books you would consider Historical Urban Fantasy with settings that are earlier or later* than 19th century?

_____
*By "later than 19th century" I mean set early enough in the 20th that we would consider them historical rather than contemporary.
 
Interesting thread, Teresa, because you just reminded me of TJ's comments in my Genre Serials post about my WIP (I'd always assumed it was more or less supernatural horror, but TJ quite rightly said that's for discussion when it's completed not now, as it might end up as historical fantasy etc.)

Anyway, that doesn't help you, but I would suggest that one of my all time favourite books, Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell could be Historical Urban Fantasy, and the subsequent Ladies of Grace Adieu anthology by the same author. A lot of it occurs in London.

However, they're talked about as being magical realism so I suppsoe it could be a matter of preference.

I remember when I first read Northern Lights, I got the sense that Lyra's Oxford was rooted in Victoriana. I'm not sure if that is true, but it always had that sense to it for me.


pH
 
Aliette de Bodard maybe? The house of Shattered Wings? I'm not sure when it's actually set but it has a old-Paris feel to it. A few others, maybe:

Kate Mosse, Sepulchre etc? She also wrote a winter story - the name escapes me - which was set in old world France and was distinctly urbanish. I'd guess early 20th century.

A couple of the magical realists come to mind. The Deptford Trilogy by Robertson Davies is set in the early 20th century (it's a remarkable book, if you haven't read it.) also, maybe, Marina by Zafon and Allende's House of the Spirits which starts early 20th century too?
 
The Lies of Locke Lamora is renaissance era fantasy that mostly takes place in a city... but feels nothing like what we call Urban Fantasy.

Is Urban Fantasy fantasy that takes place in a city, or fantasy that takes place in a city that features a mortal world and a hidden supernatural world?
 
Is Urban Fantasy fantasy that takes place in a city, or fantasy that takes place in a city that features a mortal world and a hidden supernatural world?

Well, that's the big question, isn't it? I wish the people who put together the program had let us know what they mean when they say "Urban Fantasy." Because I could talk about it either way, but would prefer to know what the audience is going to come into the room expecting, because I hate to disappoint them. (I've been a disappointed audience member too many times myself.)

Jo, I should have thought of Marina, shouldn't I. Thanks for the reminder! I've been tempted by the de Bodard book but never read it. Maybe I will now before Friday. If I get the chance.
 
Jon Courtenay Grimwood did a series about werewolves and vampires in historical Venice. I think it was called the Assassini Trilogy.
 
oh Doh!

Yes, pity, because they are not purely vampire or purely werewolf, so it makes it a more general urban fantasy.

I'd suggest Barbara Hambly's series which has an Edwardian background - that is purely vampire. But very much entwined with the history of the period and also a take on the whole agent of the crown literature of that period and a bit later. (Hint of John Buchan for example.)
 
Well, that's the big question, isn't it? I wish the people who put together the program had let us know what they mean when they say "Urban Fantasy." Because I could talk about it either way, but would prefer to know what the audience is going to come into the room expecting, because I hate to disappoint them. (I've been a disappointed audience member too many times myself.)

Jo, I should have thought of Marina, shouldn't I. Thanks for the reminder! I've been tempted by the de Bodard book but never read it. Maybe I will now before Friday. If I get the chance.

Well... if you don't know, neither do they. Maybe you should lead with that as a question and at least get an interesting discussion out of that.

From what I've read of them (which isn't nearly enough because Angry Robot don't seem to be selling it so I've only read the kindle sample of the book I brought two months ago notmadatall), de Bodard's Obsidian and Blood also seem to be rather urban. Which leads me to the observation that most fantasy crime books have 'historical' cities as their basis - Buroker's The Emperor's Edge, our own Thaddeus' Bane of Souls, Martin Scott's Thraxas, I think Glen Cook's Garrett, to name just a few. Cities and crime go together like strawberries and cream (and there's a few, like Locke Lamora, that cover it from the opposite angle).

Which leads me to Pratchett's Discworld, where of course the City Watch books are very urban and feature a lot of the UF staples of Vampires and Werewolves, and even a sense of hidden world. Like Angua taking Cheery to Biers in Feet of Clay, or Vimes meeting the deep down dwarves and Mr Shine in Thud. Plus there's the Industrial Revolution books, looking at progress in a historical fantasy world... Pratchett probably is the best there has been to date at historical fantasy set in Cities - capital C because the City is almost a character in its own right, as the setting should be. For my money at least.
 
Well... if you don't know, neither do they. Maybe you should lead with that as a question and at least get an interesting discussion out of that.

Yes, I've been thinking I will do that if the moderator doesn't do it first. When does a fantasy stop just being a story that happens to take place in a city and acquire that certain something that distinguishes it as Urban Fantasy? Can it still be Urban Fantasy if it has all the usual UF stuff except a city?

Although that's not enough to fill an hour-and-a-quarter, which is why I appreciate all the suggestions of specific books and authors you are all making, because talking about those should help me to do my part to fill the time (there are only three of us on the panel, so even with a Q&A at the end, we've each got to pull our weight.

I always feel like a panel is going well when I see folks in the audience pulling out paper and pen and scribbling down the names of books to look for.
 
Can it still be Urban Fantasy if it has all the usual UF stuff except a city?
I always thought so, but Wikipedia seems to think I'm wrong on this (it's happened before:)). I'd always thought that Urban Fantasy meant a story set in the real world rather than necessarily being set in a city (I think that's also called First World fantasy?) and I also thought Urban Fantasy meant set in contemporary times (anything set far enough in the past being historical fantasy?). But Wikipedia's entry suggests differently. There's also a nice long list of UF authors, including some historical ones:
Urban fantasy - Wikipedia
 
Might I suggest Robert Rankin's 'The witches of Chiswick'
Most of the action takes place in Victorian London, bit of time travelling etc
 
I always thought so, but Wikipedia seems to think I'm wrong on this (it's happened before:)). I'd always thought that Urban Fantasy meant a story set in the real world rather than necessarily being set in a city (I think that's also called First World fantasy?) and I also thought Urban Fantasy meant set in contemporary times (anything set far enough in the past being historical fantasy?). But Wikipedia's entry suggests differently. There's also a nice long list of UF authors, including some historical ones:
Urban fantasy - Wikipedia

I'd say that many readers think of a modern 'real-world' setting full of vampires, werewolves, wizards and fey when you say 'Urban Fantasy' to them.

And I believe that the idea of Urban Fantasy was to put a more modern spin on the tropes of Epic Fantasy in order to create an alternative to that genre.

But I can see why, on paper, the city setting is what defines 'Urban Fantasy'. It's all there in the name!

And many Urban Fantasy series depict the city as almost a character in itself.

The Dresden Files would not be the same without Chicago.

The Toby Daye series is set in San Francisco and features hunky surfers, eccentric academics and terrible parking.

Recent novel Poison City is set in Durban in South Africa and the spirit of that city oozes venemously from every page.

London alone has been depicted or even personified as a fantastical land in Neverwhere, the Skyscraper Throne series, Rivers of London series and the Matthew Swift series. I often worry that my own writing, (which is partially set in London), doesn't really have anything new or interesting to say about the city.

Truly great Urban Fantasy captures the magic, the soul, of the city itself. Or the writer's interpretation of it at least.

That must make historical Urban Fantasy more difficult to write in some ways. You can't draw on your own experiences of living in Ancient Rome, Renaissance Florence or Istanbul back in the time when it was called Constantinople. You're readers can't either. So you have to draw more on the myths about that city as well as its history to find something for people to relate to.
 
Although there is something to be said for writing about a city at a key point in history.

Venice when it was a world power. (Plenty of secondary world Fantasy novelists use this as a basis for their settings).

Florence when it was one of the cradles of the Renaissance. (The TV Series Da Vinci's Demons makes a lot of this, at least in the first season).

London when it was the heart of the largest empire the world has ever known.

Chicago in the time of Al Capone.

Paris in the mid to late 19th Century. A haven for artists and philosophers with a whole hour of the day named for the drinking of absinthe; the infamous Green Fairy.
 
I'd say that many readers think of a modern 'real-world' setting full of vampires, werewolves, wizards and fey when you say 'Urban Fantasy' to them.

And I believe that the idea of Urban Fantasy was to put a more modern spin on the tropes of Epic Fantasy in order to create an alternative to that genre.

But I can see why, on paper, the city setting is what defines 'Urban Fantasy'. It's all there in the name!

Inneresting. Can't say I ever got that feeling from it. For me UF goes back to the source material and brings back a set of ideas mostly untouched by Epic Fantasy's conventions. But I could be wrong. Any pointers as to why you believe that?

And many Urban Fantasy series depict the city as almost a character in itself.

The Dresden Files would not be the same without Chicago.
...
Truly great Urban Fantasy captures the magic, the soul, of the city itself. Or the writer's interpretation of it at least.

That must make historical Urban Fantasy more difficult to write in some ways. You can't draw on your own experiences of living in Ancient Rome, Renaissance Florence or Istanbul back in the time when it was called Constantinople. You're readers can't either. So you have to draw more on the myths about that city as well as its history to find something for people to relate to.

To the best of my knowledge, Butcher has never lived in Chicago and what he knows of the city is research and visits. And I'm going to guess a lot of his readers have never lived there either (although obviously we have our own examples of modern urban life). As such I am dubious about whether this factor of specific personal experience is the big difference.

Certainly it is possible to use the city as a character in historical fiction - Lindsay Davies' Falco books set in ancient Rome are a fantastic example. And while that's partly the result of fantastic research, I think its also partly down to drawing on the universality of cities. Have you been poor in a city? Congratulations, you've probably had a landlord who you thought deserved the most vicious punishment your moral code permits - just like Falco.


Anyway. Point A - VE Schwaab A Darker Shade of Magic. Can't believe I failed to mention it until now. Its set in Regency era London and a set of parallel universe Londons, which provide the 'hidden magic' motif that so often marks UF. Also there's a thief which is further proof of my new belief that crime is a nigh-universal ingredient in 'historical' Urban Fantasy.

Point B - Just thought I'd look at wiki for a definition...

"Urban fantasy is a subgenre of fantasy defined by place; the fantastic narrative has an urban setting, because it seems that stories with said setting are distinct enough to warrrant their own sub-subgenre. Urban fantasy exists on one side of a spectrum,[citation needed] opposite high fantasy, which is set in an entirely fictitious world. Many urban fantasies are set in contemporary times and contain supernatural elements. However, the stories can take place in historical, modern, or futuristic periods. The prerequisite is that they must be primarily set in a city."

"Urban fantasy describes a work that is set primarily in the real world and contains aspects of fantasy. These matters may involve the arrivals of alien races, the discovery of earthbound mythological creatures, coexistence between humans and paranormal beings, conflicts between humans and malicious paranormals, and subsequent changes to city management.[3][4]

Although stories may be set in contemporary times, this characteristic is not necessary for the fiction to be considered urban fantasy,[1] as works of the genre may also take place in futuristic and historical settings, real or imagined.[3] Author Marie Brennan has set urban fantasy in Elizabethan London, while author Charles de Lint has featured the genre in the fictional city of Newford."

So... its very set on the idea that Urban Fantasy is about the use of real world locations but then goes on to admit one of the founding fathers of the genre didn't use a real world location. Good work there!

Also, they say its mainly about the city, but here they include American Gods, which is about as urban as a Monster Truck Demolition Derby. In fact, if you look at that list, you might be tempted to say Urban Fantasy is fantasy set in the modern age and that historical urban fantasy is a contradiction in terms...


Point C - While writing this, I just remembered Daniel Polansky's Straight Razor Cure. Fantasy-Noir, can't quite place the era but definitely not modern and very much city based. But does the city have its own character? Debatable.
 
This seems to be one of those times when Wikipedia provides as much confusion as clarification. (But then, anyone can contribute to Wikipedia, so it's not altogether reliable.) But it does provide a lot of food for discussion this time, and that's what I want, so thanks Peat!

(I was already thinking of Marie Brennan since I recently finished Midnight Never Come and Deeds of Men and have With Fate Conspire waiting for me on my Kindle. She's going to be at the convention, too, and doing panels—I'm on a panel with her on Monday—but strangely not this one or the one on Fantastic Beasts, either.)
 

Similar threads


Back
Top