Bright (2017) [Will Smith | Netflix]

I didn't realise that it was based upon a game, but it has struck me, considering the popularity of Harry Potter that, besides Buffy and a few other TV series about witches, there hasn't been anything on film, set in a present day world where magic was real, made for adults.

Exactly. Everything they've made has been for the children, hobbits or young adults. There isn't much that is set in the adult world, or even dare to engage some fantasy. Shadowrun is set in the world, where man meets magic and machine. Just add couple of more things in the "bright" series and you've dived deep within that hugely popular realm.
 
When David Ayer and Will Smith’s Netflix tentpole “Bright” became available to stream on December 22, it was met with some of the most hostile reviews of 2017. IndieWire’s own David Ehrlich gave the film an F rating, calling the fantasy-realism film “miserable” and “the worst film of the year,” and the film currently has a 26% on Rotten Tomatoes. But the abysmal reviews couldn’t stop “Bright” from becoming a humongous hit on Netflix and earning a sequel.


At the end of last year, a report from Nielsen Ratings revealed that 11 million Netflix users streamed “Bright” during its first three days of release, which put it just under “Stranger Things” territory. While Netflix executives Ted Sarandos and Reed Hastings would not disclose the specific amount of “Bright” viewers during an investors conference call this week, they did confirm that “Bright” is one of the biggest original offerings they’ve ever produced, including film and television series.

According to both Netlfix bosses, “Bright’s” success is proof that film critics don’t matter as much when they’re trying to tap into a global audience.

“Critics are an important part of the artistic process, but [they are] pretty disconnected from the commercial prospects of a film,” chief content officer Sarandos said. “[Film critics] speak to specific audiences who care about quality, or how objectively good or bad a movie is—not the masses who are critical for determining whether a film makes money.”
Netflix Executives Say ‘Bright’ Success Proves Film Critics Are ‘Disconnected From Mass Appeal’
 
Quite often the critics score on rotten tomatoes is in conflict with the score from the general audience. It seems critics look for something different in a film than the people it was actually made for, the paying public.
 
It seems critics look for something different in a film than the people it was actually made for, the paying public.

Yeah, I've noticed this. So, when I write, I write honestly with my feelings and I'm not afraid to say things, even if some people dislike it. To me, being honest is better than trying to mask it with lies.
 
In these days of social media and niche magazines and blogs, surely film critics need to be honest if they want anyone to keep reading them. When I was younger, there were only the newspapers and Barry Norman on BBC TV. I don't think Barry Norman ever gave a science fiction film a good review. IIRC he hated both Star Wars and Alien. He rarely had time for a film unless it was arty or some period drama. I don't know if that was a kind of film snobbery or just his own honest personal view. We continued to watch him only because there was no alternative choices. Now that there is so much more choice in everything, there is also more choice of reviewers. People find a reviewer who agrees with them and then follow their reviews. No one need to care what the modern equivalent of Barry Norman thinks anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ctg
People find a reviewer who agrees with them and then follow their reviews. No one need to care what the modern equivalent of Barry Norman thinks anymore.

Like my reviews with a connected universe twist?
 
this isn't Harry Potter, Raistlin or Gandalf kind of stuff

Haven't seen the movie yet, though it's in my queue and interests me. I had to reply though, in order to say how happy I am to see Raistlin on this shortlist!
 

Similar threads


Back
Top