That is very good. Is that in the South Downs?
I'm glad you like it. The road eastwards climbs up into the Downs from the valley, and gives you this spacious view. The Cuckmere River is not that wide in Summer, but this picture seems to be from a visit in February/ early March 1939: at this time of year the valley is usually flooded to some degree, especially out of sight, further upriver.That is very good. Is that in the South Downs?
If you google Cuckmere Haven you'll see some photos taken from almost exactly the same viewpoint. Quite interesting to compare the two; the one realist and the other, would it be fair to say, slightly impressionistic in style.I'm glad you like it. The road eastwards climbs up into the Downs from the valley, and gives you this spacious view. The Cuckmere River is not that wide in Summer, but this picture seems to be from a visit in February/ early March 1939: at this time of year the valley is usually flooded to some degree, especially out of sight, further upriver.
"East of the Sun, West of the Moon" illustrated by Kay Nielsen (Taschen 2018 edition). Norwegian folk/fairy tales. This is an exquisite production. It feels like handling a work of art. This is despite realising that I had bought the smaller of the two hardback editions (just 20.3cm X 14cm). I'm delighted with it. I also hadn't read it before.
I managed to get to the end but it was a struggle. It's a rare occasion where I think the film is better for stripping away a lot of the really rather pretentious stuff the book is full off. Maybe that's a little unfair; I guess if you happen to be a religious historian you'll love all of that stuff!I bailed on Name of the Rose. My latin was too far in the past to be any help and the church history is even duller than I remember it being K-12. Strip those away and you've basically got a mediocre Holmes knock off overstuffed with obscure debates on medieval Catholic theology. I'd prefer Fr Brown or a few Agatha Christie if I want church-related intrigue.
Yes, I think that's the case. I hadn't realised that there were two editions, and thought that I was ordering the one that you have. When it arrived two or three months ago I was disappointed and just thought I'd got the size wrong. When I got round to reading it a few days ago, I checked back on Amazon and realised that there were two (2015 and 2018) and that mine was the 2018 edition. Once I got into reading mine, I thought it exquisite and (rather to my surprise) did not yearn for the larger edition. If I remember right from Amazon, your edition, being larger, has less pages. Amazon can be tricksy though, it took me several lots of clicking to realise that there were these two editions.I think I have that one -- it's by Taschen and fits your description, but is marked 2015, and is 29.5 x 24. Are there two editions that are identical apart from sizing, then? TBH I think the smaller size might be better -- some of the pictures in mine look too enlarged, seemingly bigger than their original size. I haven't read it yet.
If I remember right from Amazon, your edition, being larger, has less pages.
Just the one column. I can see two would be strange.Does yours have the text in two columns, or one? I find the two-column format a bit strange in a book.