December Reading Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Started rereading some books by one of my favorite authors, Leon Garfield. Most of his books were written for children (and I love those, too) but a few with adults specifically in mind. A few are fantasy (ghosts in particular) but even with those that are not there is just something fantastical about his 18th century and Victorian settings that appeals to the fantasy reader in me. Just finished The Pleasure Garden, which explores guilt and grace and secrets and redemption with a light touch of mysticism. I don't why his books aren't more highly regarded. But fortunately, a lot of them that have long been out of print are being reissued as ebooks. I hope the rest will follow.
 
Barbara Freese's social history of the black rock called Coal.
I read it a few years ago, IIRC I didn't find it too interesting, I knew most of the British side of it from various National Union of Mineworkers weekend schools. The history of Pittsburgh and US mining was a bit 'school primer'.
The power stations with injected pulverised coal was about the only fascinating thing
 
Starting Fear City by F. Paul Wilson, which is the last of the Repairman Jack: The Early Years novels.
 
Started rereading some books by one of my favorite authors, Leon Garfield. Most of his books were written for children (and I love those, too) but a few with adults specifically in mind. A few are fantasy (ghosts in particular) but even with those that are not there is just something fantastical about his 18th century and Victorian settings that appeals to the fantasy reader in me. Just finished The Pleasure Garden, which explores guilt and grace and secrets and redemption with a light touch of mysticism. I don't why his books aren't more highly regarded. But fortunately, a lot of them that have long been out of print are being reissued as ebooks. I hope the rest will follow.
A particular Garfield favourite is The God Beneath the Sea which was coauthored with Edward Blishen.
 
I roared through Winter World by A.G. Riddle. It is a First Contact book and it is very well done. I love the main characters and "fairly" near future Hard S.F. situation. The Space abilities of Earth would look to me to be about 50 years or so down the road from here.

I was so impressed I moved right into The Solar War by A.G. Riddle this is the sequel and it is also solid, but it may be a little more Space Fantasy than the first. (I couldn't say this definitely yet.) I have little doubt I'll move on to book three after this.
 
So, although I do not think every book should be white washed optimism, a kind of "pollyanna" story if you will. I do believe that without genuine hope and examples of selfless service this world will become measurably worse and that the stories we claim as our's play a role in what we become.

Well put! It's a big part of why I've so thoroughly enjoyed Tad Williams' Memory, Sorrow & Thorn trilogy. I find people trying to do good/the right thing in a world that seems to so readily reward the opposite far more interesting than people being reluctantly dragged into doing a bit of good while still being just ambivalent enough about it to remain cool.

I recently read the Poppy War, which was intense and unsettling, but unfulfilling. The main character is quite the trendy anti-hero, channeling her rage into significant power. But her motives make little sense: ostensibly patriotism to a country that doesn't care about or do anything for her, which she acknowledges might be a simple pretext for pursuit of power. There are surely the usual gray questions... how bad can she be before she is worse than the enemy? But it's boring. I'm supposed to root for her because... their atrocities were the ones I read about first? Does this character deserve my attention simply because they're not as awful as everyone else in the book?

In contrast, I just picked up To Green Angel Tower, (bailed on Zahn's Specter of the Past... the SW novels were always hit and miss with me and this one is a textbook case of diminishing sequel returns) the final installment of Williams' trilogy and was immediately hooked again. These are people I root for, people I want to think about in my real life... people that don't give up and sell out their principles because everyone else is and it's easier. People that stand by friends and loved ones, no matter the cost, that keep fighting even when it seems futile.

And as you say, I just don't see how this is somehow deemed hard to believe, while Joe Abercrombie or GRRM are "realistic" in portraying every human in their novels as a self-centered, psychopathic narcissist. Sure they're bad-asses and have all the cool quips, but in my world people DO stop to help stranded motorists they don't know, or donate time to soup kitchens and mentoring programs, or help old ladies carry groceries. I don't see how a world where no such people exist and everyone is like Eastwood's Man With No Name is somehow more realistic.
 
Last edited:
I just finished reading A Clash of Kings by George R. R. Martin for the second time in my quest to read through all available books in A Song of Ice and Fire for the first time. It has indeed been awhile since I read this book, and while some particulars didn't line up with my memory, I do remember enjoying the read. I enjoyed reading it this time as well, even more so on a re-read. Now I'm on to A Storm of Swords book three for the first time.
 
I'm going through a non-fiction phase at the moment. I finished Leonard Susskind's Classical Mechanics: The Theoretical Minimum, during the reading of which I discovered he and I have very different definitions of the word "minimum" :) . It started with calculus and got harder from there...

It took me ages to read all that but in stark contrast I'm already halfway through Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow. It's totally engrossing - a fascinating study of how our conscious and unconscious minds works. And not a formula in sight (phew!):)
 
Just started Our Child Of The Stars by Stephen Cox, published by Jo Fletcher. Its very much a soft sci-fi in the mould of ET, and is set at the end of 1960s New England, when the summers of love have retreated, leaving only uncertainty ahead. So far it's a very gentle and interesting read, but I've got a feeling something bad involving The Man (that's some 60s sland for right there, folks) is about to happen.
 
I am well into Our Angry Earth by Isaac Asimov and Frederik Pohl, a 2018 reprint of a 1991 nonfiction book about the planet's many environmental problems, with introduction and afterword by Kim Stanley Robinson. The bottom line is that the situation isn't going to get any better, or even stay the same, without some serious action being taken.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads


Back
Top