February 2020 Reading Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Galactic, sorry if it sounded like I was saying you said the two types of experiences were equivalent. But some people do seem to see the matter that way, and it might be good if they were encouraged to reflect on the habit.

My guess is that as I get (even) older, I will turn to recorded books more -- if I can find good recordings of the ones I want.

Incidentally I read most, at least, of The Silmarillion onto cassettes when it came out (for a blind friend). Over the years, I must have read several dozen books to my wife -- lots of short stories and novels. Do we have any folks here who have done a lot of reading aloud to one or more other adults, or who have been read to as adults? As I've become older, my throat seems to get dry faster than when I was 30 or so, and, no, that's not said as an excuse for reaching for the beer mug!

No worries, Extollager. It's refreshing and enjoyable to have an internet discussion that doesn't degenerate to argument and name calling. :)

I'm not out to convince anyone of the superiority of audio books, especially when I don't believe it myself. Just the utility as an alternate method of reading. I couldn't imaging curling up with a pair of headphones next to a fire, much the way I couldn't imagine propping the next book on the steering wheel (though I've seen psychotic people doing just that).
 
I just finished The Worm Re-turns (1965) edited by James V. McConnell, a collection of pieces from the humorous science publication The Worm Runner's Digest. Everything from cartoons to little poems to mock essays, many reprinted from other sources.

I will then move on to Science, Sex, and Sacred Cows (1971) edited by James V. McConnell and Marlys Schutjer, which is more of the same.
 
I'm reading Lancaster and York: the War of the Roses, by Alison Weir. Only a few pages in.

Next up will be a Witcher book, or maybe returning to the third Chronicles of the Black Gate book.
 
For me, besides all the practical considerations (rereading a sentence or a paragraph, etc), reading is primarily a matter of converting signs on a page into my inner voice, which evokes mental images. Listening to a book on tape makes it impossible for that inner voice to take over, and thereby makes it much harder and/or impossible (depending on the book) for the mental images to arise. I find listening to and reading a book to be completely different, even incompatible experiences, and I cannot enjoy audio books in the least.
 
A while back, when I was going to a gym, I listened to The Silmarillion (Martin Shaw), The Hobbit and LotR (Rob Inglis) while on the elliptical. I still followed with my huge hardback illustrated editions propped on the machine. It was a great way to get to use those editions, and experience the books.
 
Just to note a tangential something I don't think anyone has mentioned: The proliferation of audiobooks -- and podcasts and other such audio works -- seems likely to be a boon to the blind and to those with reading disorders like dyslexia. Not that it replaces reading, but that it supplements reading and maybe makes available a wider range of works.

Randy M.
 
Belatedly, what I read last month but didn't get around to reporting before closing the January thread:

I duly finished Lud-in-the-Mist by Hope Mirrlees but I'm still conflicted over it. I enjoyed the writing and some of the fantasy ideas, but I wasn't taken with whatever message was meant to be behind the fairy fruit -- art, fantasy itself, drug use?? The Duke is a serial rapist and both he and his fairy accomplices drive people to suicide and others to murder, yet it appears we're meant to side with them against the bourgeois and unimaginative merchants who rule the city.

Another Christmas present I raced through was Felix the Railway Cat by Kate Moore, a “biography” of a cat who is taken on as a tiny kitten at Huddersfield station as a rodent control operative. Light weight with some amusing anecdotes, but not enough photos of our Felix herself.

The charity bookshop of our local National Trust stately home had a display of books by cosy murder mystery writer M.C. Beaton following her death, and I picked up a couple. The obituary I read of her said she was upset not to be honoured by fellow crime writers in the UK, and I noted that both books were published in the US long before here, and having read them, I understand why. Death of a Nag was the better of the two, a Hamish Macbeth story ostensibly set in 1995 when it was published but seemed more late 1970s in setting and tone, with Hamish taking a holiday in a Scottish B&B that’s cheap and terrible, where one of the patrons of the B&B is murdered by being thwacked on the head with driftwood. Hamish himself wasn't badly drawn, but the other characters were caricatures, and the plot hackneyed with no resemblance to actual police procedure or anything else of the 90s -- it read as if written by someone who had once lived in the UK, but had long since emigrated and now had no idea what went on. An aspect that was even worse with the second novel, Haunted House featuring Agatha Raisin, which was published and presumably set in 2003 but which read more like 1953, in which there are murders in a small village where a Tudor cottage holds clues to the Civil War. Characters ciphers, mostly unlikeable, plot hackneyed, writing poor.

To soothe my spirits after hearing what BBC America is planning to do with Sam Vimes and his team, I turned to Night Watch by Terry Pratchett, my favourite Discworld novel. Sam is catapulted back 30 years together with the maniac murderer, Carcer, and takes on the mantle of John Keel, the copper who taught him everything he knew. A brilliant, witty read with lots to say about rulers, rules and the ruled.

Also excellent, The Empyreus Proof by our own HareBrain, which I should have finished in December but which ended up hanging over until the new year to finish the last 100 pages or so. Exciting and heart-breaking moments, if not quite as pacy and dramatic as TGP.

And the last of January's haul, Windhaven by GRRM Martin and Lisa Tuttle, written in 1981. Maris wants to be a flyer, but she isn’t born into one of the families who inherit the exalted position and fly as messengers, the only speedy and reliable method of communication between the scattered islands of the planet as the seas are dangerous. The book started life as two novellas, to which a third was added to create a novel so we get three separate stories about Maris and her flying career, when she's in her late teens, her 30s and then 50s, with a prologue of her as a child (by far the best part of the book as far as I was concerned) and an epilogue on her death bed, with the intervening years largely ignored or glossed over. Although the two later stories flow from her initial disruption of the heredity-based transmission of the valuable wings, to me it didn't really hang together well as a novel. Nonetheless, still well worth a read.

 
Finished Beartown and gave it 2.5/5. The story was interesting, but I felt it was way too long and drawn out at time. The book could've easily been 100 pages shorter. I'm not too motivated to reading the sequel. I'm taking a short break from fiction and jumping into those:

say-nothing.jpg
 
Francis Lyall "Clifford D. Simak. An Affectionate Appreciation"
If you're a Simak enthusiast - and I am - then this is a wonderful book. Frank (Francis) knew CDS and edited the series of Simak collections that came out in the 80s/90s, so is well qualified to link the man with the writings. This is not a biography (I've read that Simak was very much against one) but it is exactly what it says on the cover - an affectionate critical appreciation that draws together the various themes of Simak's writing coherently giving a better understanding of the distinctive mellowness and beauty that underlies the stories. In recent years it has seemed very possible that Simak could just slip into the mists of time and be forgotten, something made all the easier by the relative lack of information about him. For me this would be such a shame as he offers a truly unique perspective among SF writers, one deeply embedded in the rural Wisconsin of his childhood yet also able to travel to the stars without losing his innate empathy for his fellow beings, be they alien or human. Frank's book teases out the special qualities inherent in Simak's writing wonderfully well, and ensures that those who love his writing have this thoughtful summary to fall back on.

A brief note here on why I love Simak's stories. In my teens and early twenties he was just another writer as far as I was concerned. I'd read and liked City and Way Station, but I did not see him as anything that special. I was more interested in others such as Farmer, Zelazny, Dick. I then read relatively little SF other than old favourites for a good few years. In my 50s I began to pick up on Simak and realised that he was writing at much the same age as I was then and that perhaps because of this I could connect with him more than with other writers: he did not hit his stride as a writer until he was in his late 40s and then continued into his early 80s. I think that as a result there are no adrenaline driven rollercoasters, just a more measured mature pace reflecting a wonder of what it is to be alive. There are no blockbusters or bestsellers just a series of stories that gradually inveigle their way into your consciousness so that you feel better about yourself and others and the world around you.
 
I have to confess I've never read any Simak -- or at least I don't recall any (as a teenager I read all the books my elder brother obtained so went through a lot of SF, but not all of it has stuck) -- but the personal note you've added there makes it sounds like he wrote the kind of work I might appreciate now.
 
I finished The Human Division (book 5 in John Scalzi’s “Old Man’s War” series). Enjoyable enough, but there is a definite drop in story quality as the series progresses. Still, all top quality stuff. Now on to book 6, The End of All Things.
 
And the last of January's haul, Windhaven by GRRM Martin and Lisa Tuttle, written in 1981. Maris wants to be a flyer, but she isn’t born into one of the families who inherit the exalted position and fly as messengers, the only speedy and reliable method of communication between the scattered islands of the planet as the seas are dangerous. The book started life as two novellas, to which a third was added to create a novel so we get three separate stories about Maris and her flying career, when she's in her late teens, her 30s and then 50s, with a prologue of her as a child (by far the best part of the book as far as I was concerned) and an epilogue on her death bed, with the intervening years largely ignored or glossed over. Although the two later stories flow from her initial disruption of the heredity-based transmission of the valuable wings, to me it didn't really hang together well as a novel. Nonetheless, still well worth a read.

I've thought about this book often. I read it at least a couple of decades ago and was really taken by interpersonal dynamics. I could really identify with being born into a family who was not part of the favored group. ---- I almost am embarrassed to admit this after becoming much more aware of the role of white privilege in America and how many ways I actually was favored that I had never even considered. --- I wondered about the science but it made enough sense at the time. Having read a bit more about planets and atmospheres I wonder if I would still be able to say the same thing if I should read it again. --- and I just might.

Edit: GRRM Martin!? I just glanced back and saw who one of the authors were. I would have bet a steak dinner that I'd never read anything by him. Maybe Lisa Tuttle was a lead writer?
 
I have to confess I've never read any Simak -- or at least I don't recall any (as a teenager I read all the books my elder brother obtained so went through a lot of SF, but not all of it has stuck) -- but the personal note you've added there makes it sounds like he wrote the kind of work I might appreciate now.
I recommend "Way Station"

I meant to include in my comments:
Frank (Francis) wrote
"CDS told me in our conversation that he had gotten most satisfaction out of writing Way Station, A Choice of Gods and Project Pope"
"...he had most fun in writing The Goblin Reservation, Out of Their Minds and Enchanted Pilgrimage"


and
"Among the short stories CDS' favourites are 'The Sitters', 'The Thing in the Stone', 'The Autumn Land' and 'The Ghost of a Model T'."
...."To those he later added 'The Grotto of the Dancing Deer'."
 
Edit: GRRM Martin!? I just glanced back and saw who one of the authors were. I would have bet a steak dinner that I'd never read anything by him. Maybe Lisa Tuttle was a lead writer?

Nope. She was an up-and-comer, and Martin had recently established himself with his short fiction.

Randy M.
 
I have to confess I've never read any Simak -- or at least I don't recall any (as a teenager I read all the books my elder brother obtained so went through a lot of SF, but not all of it has stuck) -- but the personal note you've added there makes it sounds like he wrote the kind of work I might appreciate now.

Took me years, but I finally read City and liked it quite a bit. I should get back to him, too. Also Edgar Pangborn, another writer with enormous compassion for others, and a pretty clear view of what people are like, good and bad.

Randy M.
 
I've thought about this book often. I read it at least a couple of decades ago and was really taken by interpersonal dynamics. I could really identify with being born into a family who was not part of the favored group. ---- I almost am embarrassed to admit this after becoming much more aware of the role of white privilege in America and how many ways I actually was favored that I had never even considered. --- I wondered about the science but it made enough sense at the time. Having read a bit more about planets and atmospheres I wonder if I would still be able to say the same thing if I should read it again. --- and I just might.
That's interesting. I certainly sympathised with her wish to fly, and her anger at the way heredity ruled, but I also foresaw that her solution to the injustice would eventually cause problems and might end up doing greater harm to those without the privilege of wings. I'd have advocated reform rather than revolution. As to the science, I never gave it a thought whether it was possible!

Edit: GRRM Martin!? I just glanced back and saw who one of the authors were. I would have bet a steak dinner that I'd never read anything by him. Maybe Lisa Tuttle was a lead writer?
I think it was very much a joint effort, though he'd sold more stories than she had at that stage -- this goes into greater detail if you're interested Writing Together | George R.R. Martin
 
In recent years it has seemed very possible that Simak could just slip into the mists of time and be forgotten, something made all the easier by the relative lack of information about him.

As I've said here before, Simak (or his editors) often gave his stories noncommittal or even dull titles. Not always, of course. But I wonder if the prevalence of such titles could reduce the attractiveness of Simak for prospective new readers.

 
C.J. Tudor 'The Other People'
I'm only a couple of chapters in but this writing has got the hairs standing up on the back of my neck.

Creepy and gripping
 
Quite right! I looked it up on Goodreads and was given a bum steer. Yep, that qualifies as quite old. I’ll be interested in what you think of it incidentally.
I was happily enjoying it but then it began to seem very familiar, I skimmed ahead a couple of chapters and indeed I've read it within the last few years.
I flicked ahead to the closing chapters just to confirm this, then there didn't seem much point in going back to my original place and reading up to the penultimate chapter.
Instead I jumped to the final pages, nodded to myself and closed the book.

I dunno if that counts as a DNF or a hasty skim read
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top