Hugo 2020 Short Story nominees

Bick

Luddite Curmudgeon
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
4,349
Location
Auckland, NZ
I read the short story nominations for this years Hugo Award from the nominations pack, so thought I'd post my thoughts here. The nominations really tick the minority box this year. I've no problem of course with anyone of any gender, race or sexual orientation being nominated or awarded a Hugo, but its hard not to pause and wonder whether the best 6 short stories of the year can really have come from such specific demographics. I'm a bit of a cynic, but it seems potentially dodgy to me. I guess none of the stories written by straight, white men (i.e. the largest demographic of SF authors) were any good. I also thought it was a shame that there's not much actual science fiction on display here. Anyway, on to the stories themselves.

Do Not Look Back, My Lion – Alix E. Harrow
This is highly stylised prose, which is not normally my thing, but it’s a well-crafted and very readable fantasy tale. It subverts gender roles (normally not my thing either) but manages to do so without making a fuss about it. It has a depth and moral weight to it that probably makes it a contender for the Hugo. A good story and my favourite of these nominations. 4/5

A Catalog of Storms – Fran Wilde
I didn’t find it this particularly satisfying as it smacks of style over substance. The idea wasn’t awful but neither was it very good, and the execution was awkward, so it won’t be getting my vote. 2/5

Ten Excerpts from an Annotated Bibliography on the Cannibal Women of Ratnabar Island – Nibedita Sen
Possibly the longest title of any short story I’ve read. It’s also probably the first story I’ve read by a gay Bengali woman, so that’s expanded my horizons too. I do like the idea of writing a short piece comprising a fictional annotated bibliography (it’s rather a neat concept), but the ‘story’ here is slightly silly, strident feminism dressed up as droll cleverness and it wasn't my cup of tea. 1/5

As the Last I May Know – S. L. Huang
This is a fairly interesting dystopian premise, and the prose is well written, but the idea is slightly blunt to me and it falls just shy of being a top-drawer SF story; its ultimately rather bland considering it had decent potential. 3/5

Blood is Another Word for Hunger – Rivers Solomon
This is written with quite an individualistic style that suits the horror/fantasy subject matter at the outset. A slave girl, in what seems to be the time of the American civil war, kills her owners and gives birth to a fully grown dead girl, as a result. Unfortunately, what starts as a very engaging story went in a silly direction a few pages in and from there it lost my interest. Average at best. 2/5

And now his Lordship is Laughing – Shiv Ramdas
The only male writer represented. Written in purple prose, this is not a story that grabs you; indeed, nothing of any interest happens in the first few pages, other than a Bengali villager makes something out of jute. I couldn’t be bothered to read on further, to be honest. I figure if it cannot get my attention in 2-3 pages, it hardly deserves to win the biggest award in SF. (unrated)

Which stories did you like? I've not read all the novelettes, novellas etc. Too little time to get to them yet, but please let me know which were best in those categories if you can.
 
Last edited:
I have read 5 of the 6 stories so far.

Do Not Look Back, My Lion – Alix E. Harrow
This is highly stylised prose, which is not normally my thing, but it’s a well-crafted and very readable fantasy tale. It subverts gender roles (normally not my thing either) but manages to do so without making a fuss about it. It has a depth and moral weight to it that probably makes it a contender for the Hugo. A good story and my favourite of these nominations. 4/5
I agree and gave it the same score, 4/5.

A Catalog of Storms – Fran Wilde
I didn’t find it this particularly satisfying as it smacks of style over substance. The idea wasn’t awful but neither was it very good, and the execution was awkward, so it won’t be getting my vote. 2/5
Awkward is the proper word. Too vague and even chronologically confusing. 2/5.

Ten Excerpts from an Annotated Bibliography on the Cannibal Women of Ratnabar Island – Nibedita Sen
Possibly the longest title of any short story I’ve read. It’s also probably the first story I’ve read by a gay Bengali woman, so that’s expanded my horizons too. I do like the idea of writing a short piece comprising a fictional annotated bibliography (it’s rather a neat concept), but the ‘story’ here is slightly silly, strident feminism dressed up as droll cleverness and it wasn't my cup of tea. 1/5
Not yet read.

As the Last I May Know – S. L. Huang
This is a fairly interesting dystopian premise, and the prose is well written, but the idea is slightly blunt to me and it falls just shy of being a top-drawer SF story; its ultimately rather bland considering it had decent potential. 3/5
Yes, it had potential but it didn't deliver. It's end was weak. 3/5.

Blood is Another Word for Hunger – Rivers Solomon
This is written with quite an individualistic style that suits the horror/fantasy subject matter at the outset. A slave girl, in what seems to be the time of the American civil war, kills her owners and gives birth to a fully grown dead girl, as a result. Unfortunately, what starts as a very engaging story went in a silly direction a few pages in and from there it lost my interest. Average at best. 2/5
I like this story the best. You could call the direction it took silly, I suppose, but at least was different and unpredictable. I appreciate that. And as it was well written it got a 4.5/5.

And now his Lordship is Laughing – Shiv Ramdas
The only male writer represented. Written in purple prose, this is not a story that grabs you; indeed, nothing of any interest happens in the first few pages, other than a Bengali villager makes something out of jute. I couldn’t be bothered to read on further, to be honest. I figure if it cannot get my attention in 2-3 pages, it hardly deserves to win the biggest award in SF. (unrated)
I had no problem with it. Somewhat slow perhaps, but I don't mind that if the story is well executed. It nowhere got spectacular and the (predictive) ending was the only part you could call, with some fantasy, Fantasy. 3/5.
 
Interesting - we agree almost completely except for the Solomon. It was a novel idea I’ll give it that, but it seemed to change in tone midway, for me, and so it lost my attention.
 
"Do Not Look Back, My Lion" -- I have to admit up front that this kind of sword-and-sorcery setting isn't my favorite, so that may influence my opinion. That said, I found the gender-bending in this story somewhat artificial, and difficult to accept as a fantasy premise. It seemed to me that the same kind of tale about war and peace, love and parenthood, could have been told without it.

"A Catalog of Storms" -- An intriguing premise, but I thought more could have done with it. The metaphor between storms and emotional turmoil is fine, and might have grabbed me better if I had seen one particular battle between a storm and one of the people who name, fight, and become storms.

"Ten Excerpts" -- The brief sections didn't give me enough to get my teeth into. (An appropriate turn of phrase, I suppose.) I detected a touch of satire directed at academia, but otherwise didn't get much out of it.

"As the Last I May Know" -- Although emotionally powerful, I found the premise very difficult to believe. It was hard for me to imagine any society requiring such a sacrifice for the use of Weapons of Mass Destruction. The author is trying to say something about the terrible cost of war, I think, but I was never able to suspend my disbelief.

"Blood is Another Word for Hunger" -- This one really got to me during the first part. Powerful and a tremendous premise for a horror story. It then kind of weakened, as the initial terrible and miraculous event was repeated so many times. I would have liked to have seen the two characters from the start go on to do something on their own. I'm not sure I would call what happens late in the story "silly," exactly, but it did seem a bit over the top.

"And Now His Lordship is Laughing" -- The only one I read before, for my reviews at Tangent.com. I gave this one one of my "recommended" listings, so I'm sorry you couldn't get into it. I thought it was the most traditional of all these stories, a well-written example of the "supernatural revenge" subgenre of horror fiction. I'm not sure it's award-worthy, but it was a fine story.

It is impossible not to notice that the awards have been dominated by writers other than straight, Anglo-Saxon, cis-gendered males in recent years. One can offer many different explanations for this. Maybe persons of color, women, and LGBTQ+ persons are writing the best imaginative fiction. Maybe changes in society are drawing more attention to such writers. Maybe the Hugo voters -- and remember, anybody who joins WorldCon can nominate and vote, so it's hard to see how a "conspiracy" of the type imagined by certain alt-right types could work -- are deliberately leaning toward these authors.
 
Thanks for the thoughts Victoria.

It is impossible not to notice that the awards have been dominated by writers other than straight, Anglo-Saxon, cis-gendered males in recent years. One can offer many different explanations for this. Maybe persons of color, women, and LGBTQ+ persons are writing the best imaginative fiction.
Yes, it's certainly possible that people from what have traditionally been labelled 'minorities' may have gravitated to SFF as an ideal genre to express themselves and some of them may be writing excellent fiction. This would explain the presence of some work by writers from these demographic groups in the list, but presumably it wouldn't be expected to entirely eclipse writers who are straight or of European descent.

Maybe changes in society are drawing more attention to such writers.
It's possible but I doubt it. And in any event, increased attention means its read more, it doesn't make it better work - if its a weak story, it doesn't get a free pass to the Awards ceremony just because we increasingly recognise and respect the community.

Maybe the Hugo voters -- and remember, anybody who joins WorldCon can nominate and vote, so it's hard to see how a "conspiracy" of the type imagined by certain alt-right types could work -- are deliberately leaning toward these authors.
I doubt this too, to be honest. My suspicion is that special interest groups are organizing specific votes to back their particular cause. I submitted a few Hugo nominations myself in various categories but few if any of them made it to the short list. It probably doesn't take that many organised votes for a specific story to place it on the nominee list, as its will be up against the slightly random individual choices made by individual members, many of whom probably pick a different story by a different straight white author. This was why the sad puppies et al have been able to swing the vote so easily in the past. I think its a bit sad and it must be a bit frustrating for the majority of SFF authors.
 
My initial reaction to this lot is about this same as when I look at the choice of American presidential candidates, which is "Is this the best they can come up with"?????
I think this lot represents what is wrong with some of modern day science fiction, it's much to far up it's self!!!
P.S. What is fantasy doing here anyway, it should be pure SF and nothing else, I was always surprised at Robert Bloch's "That Hell Bound Train" winning as while it is a good story it's pure fantasy!
P.P.S. I don't want to drag politics into this, I only mention the presidency as an example!
 
Yes, there's a pretty weak connection between any of these and science fiction, bob. The other thing that struck me is that if I compare these Hugo nominees with almost any of the stories I've read and reviewed recently from Analog magazine in 1976 and 1979, the old Analog stories are far, far superior. There's not a shadow of a doubt about this to my mind.

EDIT: Which is why I can't really be bothered to read the novelettes and novella nominees as well, if I'm honest.
 
Last edited:
Of the few Hugo (or any other award) nominees I've read in the last decade or so, I've enjoyed very few of them. It seems to me that awards are being handed out based on some perceived 'artisitic' merit and not whether the story is any damned good or not. I'll take a rip roaring space adventure over a pondering navel-gazing piece meant to elicit some sort of intended emotional response every time.
 
Of the few Hugo (or any other award) nominees I've read in the last decade or so, I've enjoyed very few of them. It seems to me that awards are being handed out based on some perceived 'artisitic' merit and not whether the story is any damned good or not. I'll take a rip roaring space adventure over a pondering navel-gazing piece meant to elicit some sort of intended emotional response every time.
Yes, but that wasn't always the case as you suggest - Hugo winners until fairly recently tended to be decent SF stories with interesting plots.
 
REF: VinceW.
As regards the rip roaring space adventures I could not agree with you more, the level of boredom in modern SF seems to be far higher then in the past!
I've almost given up collecting Best of.... and Years Best..... collections, I think I might just stick with the good old stuff instead!
 
If any of you guys can hear a high pitched hum it's probably Hugo Gernsback spinning in his grave accompanied by John W. Campbell!
All I want is well thought out and well written stories with no hidden or otherwise artistic, political correct or social justice agendas.
Come back Golden Age SF, all is forgiven!!!

P.P.S. Gives birth to a fully grown dead girl, what the hell is happening to the world?????
 
Last edited:
It can't all be rubbish can it?
Why isn't the good stuff being pushed to the fore?


Shakes head in disgust!!!
 
I suspect that if there was any good stuff it would have been pushed to the fore all by itself. But there isn't.
Real good old-fashioned SF dwindled to a negligible drizzle years ago. Which may have to do with the growing realization among self-respecting SF-writers that much of their imagined futuristic worlds is in fact as much fantasy as... Fantasy. It is highly unlikely that mankind will ever travel to the stars. I believe it was Greg Bear who wrote an interesting essay about this subject.
 
Which stories did you like? I've not read all the novelettes, novellas etc. Too little time to get to them yet, but please let me know which were best in those categories if you can.

I've recently finished reading through the short stories. I think out of the fiction categories it does seem to be the weakest, which I think has happened in some other recent years as well.

I think my favourite out of them was As the Last I May Know, I was more interested in the fate of the characters than in the other stories. It's an interesting premise, although I'm not sure if the ending lived up to the rest of the story.

I thought And Now His Lordship Was Laughing was an effective horror story. One thing that confused me slightly was that early in the story it references Queen Victoria being on the throne but the later part of the stories seem to be taking place during the Bengal Famine in the 1940s. It's a minor point but I'm not sure if that was intentional I'm not sure what the author meant by it.

A Catalog of Storms was another interesting premise but ended up being a bit underwhelming. The Lion story was fine but didn't really stand out.

I didn't like the other two, Blood is Another Word For Hunger worked at the start but as it went on it was asking too much of my ability to suspend disbelief. I'm not sure I'd even say Ten Excerpts counted as a story.
 
My initial reaction to this lot is about this same as when I look at the choice of American presidential candidates, which is "Is this the best they can come up with"?????
I think this lot represents what is wrong with some of modern day science fiction, it's much to far up it's self!!!
P.S. What is fantasy doing here anyway, it should be pure SF and nothing else, I was always surprised at Robert Bloch's "That Hell Bound Train" winning as while it is a good story it's pure fantasy!
P.P.S. I don't want to drag politics into this, I only mention the presidency as an example!

The Hugo awards are for the best sci fi or fantasy work. They are not just for science fiction.
 
It's like it you have a tennis club--because there are a lot of tennis players--then you decide to let badminton and handball and ping pong players in too. Eventually the original purpose of tennis might get sidelined. Perhaps it might reach a point where a player of one of the other sports wins an award in the club and says "you know, the founder was an obnoxious jerk for focusing only on tennis."
There may still be lots of tennis players, but they don't have anywhere to play now, and they would get rusty because they don't have a place to practice or meet other tennis players.
I think an art discipline works the same way. People can write on their own, but there's probably some loss if the establishment shuns the style of work, which is the case today. Same problem with movies.
Artists benefit from some kind of structured environment where they can concentrate or be inspired (by other artists). The present day focus does not encourage it.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top