August 2021 Reading Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have just started Your Vigor for Life Appalls Me: Robert Crumb Letters 1958-1977 (2012) edited by Ilse Thompson. As the title indicates, it collects (mostly) handwritten missives from the artist, starting at the age of sixteen to the days when he became noted for his work in underground comics. They were all written to a couple of fellow comics fans. So far I have just read the introduction, which is in small print, darn it.
 
I also really liked the follow-up/prequel A Deepness in the Sky.
I don't know how to say this without giving anything away... the main alien species is remarkable. I found them confusing when they were first introduced, but when I learned more about them it was fascinating. Great Stuff.

I haven't read A Deepness... yet, mainly because of some changes in characters and setting, and I think then only because I so loved the characters/settings in A Fire... But I am putting it on my 'to buy' list now, thanks for mentioning the prequel. :)
 
I have just started Your Vigor for Life Appalls Me: Robert Crumb Letters 1958-1977 (2012) edited by Ilse Thompson. As the title indicates, it collects (mostly) handwritten missives from the artist, starting at the age of sixteen to the days when he became noted for his work in underground comics. They were all written to a couple of fellow comics fans. So far I have just read the introduction, which is in small print, darn it.
I enjoyed this but I didn't need glasses to read it back then.
 
I've got Artifact Space as one of the books on my next haul. Glad you enjoyed it, Vince.
 
I don't know how to say this without giving anything away... the main alien species is remarkable. I found them confusing when they were first introduced, but when I learned more about them it was fascinating. Great Stuff.

I haven't read A Deepness... yet, mainly because of some changes in characters and setting, and I think then only because I so loved the characters/settings in A Fire... But I am putting it on my 'to buy' list now, thanks for mentioning the prequel. :)
Deepness is definitely only loosely related to Fire, it's only really one character that connects them.

If you like the aliens in Fire then you might also like the third book The Children of the Sky which is following on directly from the ending of Fire. I think it's clearly the weakest of the three books in that Universe, it doesn't have the same scope or ambition but I still enjoyed it.
 
As a change from my usual sci Fi and crime/spy thrillers.....

Horror story time!
The Witch by Iain Rob Wright
 
Last edited:
I
Now made a start on Dangerous Visions.
When I eventually read this, after many years of anticipation, I was a bit underwhelmed. Probably inevitable given all the hype. Interesting and significant no doubt, and of its time.
 
When I eventually read this, after many years of anticipation, I was a bit underwhelmed. Probably inevitable given all the hype. Interesting and significant no doubt, and of its time.
Interesting, I’m expecting it may be patchy, but I’m enjoying Ellison’s introductions so far, and I’m sure some will be very good. It’s started brightly anyway.
 
download (1).jpg

Finally, got my hands on this. Have always been a huge fan of Neal's inter/multidisciplinary approach that has some takeaway for everyone. Excited about this!
On the non-SF front, I've been reading Trevor Noah's Born a Crime. Ironical how this guy can find the funny side of traumatic experiences. Great read so far.
 
I read Katherine Addison's The Witness for the Dead. I really enjoyed The Goblin Emperor when I read it a few years ago so I was looking forward to its semi-sequel. It is only loosely a sequel since it follows Celehar who was a minor character from the first book and is set away from the capital. The protagonist is now employed a 'Witness for the Dead' in a provincial city, his responsibilities involve dealing with the affairs of the dead, whether it be investigating their cause of death, supporting their heirs or occasionally dealing with those who won't stay dead. Celehar has a special aptitude for this since he can communicate with the dead in a very limited way. Throughout the novel he takes on various cases, with the main focuses being on a couple of murders (particularly the violent death of an opera singer) and a disputed inheritance.

The plot may be quite different from the court intrigue of the first novel but they do have some things in common, both featuring protagonists who might be quiet outsiders by nature but who have a great deal of determination to try do what they think is the right thing. One thing that is slightly weaker in this novel is that the stakes aren't as high, while Celehar does sometimes face some serious consequences after some of his investigations annoy some powerful people it isn't as compelling as the battle for control of the imperial throne in the first book. It is however interesting to see more of the world beyond the Imperial Court and how the ordinary people of that world live, it's a fairly short book but seems to pack a lot of world-building into those pages and manages to make it feel like this is a place with a long history even if most of that isn't being shown. Occasionally it can be slightly hard to keep track of all the names and titles and unfamiliar terms but for the most part I didn't find it too confusing. The various cases Celehar takes on are varied and interesting, and the conclusions are mostly satisfying even if the conclusion to one of the murder mysteries does feel a bit abrupt.

I then read Neil Gaiman's Stardust. I've seen the film adaptation multiple times but never read the book before. I think in recent years there has been a bit of a trend of modernised fairy tales, this was perhaps one of the first of those. It is an entertaining story although I found the supporting cast more interesting than Tristan himself who is a bit dull, particularly early in the story. The premise of a more adult take on traditional fairy tales does work well, although I think some other novels have perhaps done better at capturing the skewed logic and mixture of wonders and horrors of Faerie. I liked the book, but perhaps not one of Gaiman's greatest works.
 
I read Katherine Addison's The Witness for the Dead. I really enjoyed The Goblin Emperor when I read it a few years ago so I was looking forward to its semi-sequel. It is only loosely a sequel since it follows Celehar who was a minor character from the first book and is set away from the capital. The protagonist is now employed a 'Witness for the Dead' in a provincial city, his responsibilities involve dealing with the affairs of the dead, whether it be investigating their cause of death, supporting their heirs or occasionally dealing with those who won't stay dead. Celehar has a special aptitude for this since he can communicate with the dead in a very limited way. Throughout the novel he takes on various cases, with the main focuses being on a couple of murders (particularly the violent death of an opera singer) and a disputed inheritance.

The plot may be quite different from the court intrigue of the first novel but they do have some things in common, both featuring protagonists who might be quiet outsiders by nature but who have a great deal of determination to try do what they think is the right thing. One thing that is slightly weaker in this novel is that the stakes aren't as high, while Celehar does sometimes face some serious consequences after some of his investigations annoy some powerful people it isn't as compelling as the battle for control of the imperial throne in the first book. It is however interesting to see more of the world beyond the Imperial Court and how the ordinary people of that world live, it's a fairly short book but seems to pack a lot of world-building into those pages and manages to make it feel like this is a place with a long history even if most of that isn't being shown. Occasionally it can be slightly hard to keep track of all the names and titles and unfamiliar terms but for the most part I didn't find it too confusing. The various cases Celehar takes on are varied and interesting, and the conclusions are mostly satisfying even if the conclusion to one of the murder mysteries does feel a bit abrupt.

I then read Neil Gaiman's Stardust. I've seen the film adaptation multiple times but never read the book before. I think in recent years there has been a bit of a trend of modernised fairy tales, this was perhaps one of the first of those. It is an entertaining story although I found the supporting cast more interesting than Tristan himself who is a bit dull, particularly early in the story. The premise of a more adult take on traditional fairy tales does work well, although I think some other novels have perhaps done better at capturing the skewed logic and mixture of wonders and horrors of Faerie. I liked the book, but perhaps not one of Gaiman's greatest works.
There is a cracking BBC radio version of Stardust, dunno if it is still available tho!
 
After finishing Criminal Intent by Sheldon Siegel another solid legal/mystery novel. I've moved on to this:

hercules text.jpg


This is a remake of McDevitt's first novel. There are a few points where you can tell that decades ago. --- Although it's set in near time (late 2100's?) it's jarring when the Washington "Redskins" have not yet changed their name. There are other subtle things, but all of that is very minor. This is a really good first contact novel with (for me) a surprising amount of Christian consideration which is NOT entirely negative. What a pleasant change! This is intriguing. I'll say more after I've finished.
 
After finishing Criminal Intent by Sheldon Siegel another solid legal/mystery novel. I've moved on to this:

View attachment 81368

This is a remake of McDevitt's first novel. There are a few points where you can tell that decades ago. --- Although it's set in near time (late 2100's?) it's jarring when the Washington "Redskins" have not yet changed their name. There are other subtle things, but all of that is very minor. This is a really good first contact novel with (for me) a surprising amount of Christian consideration which is NOT entirely negative. What a pleasant change! This is intriguing. I'll say more after I've finished.
Yeah, I really like that book - so much so that I bought the original so I could read that version, too, though I haven't gotten around to it yet. At the extremes, there's BEMs and Blasters (which I often like) and faux-arts SF (which I often don't) but then there's just profound, realistic, but still imaginative and compelling, SF. That's what this was to me.
 
I

When I eventually read this, after many years of anticipation, I was a bit underwhelmed. Probably inevitable given all the hype. Interesting and significant no doubt, and of its time.
It is certainly hyped and I guess it is fair to say it doesn't live up to the extremes of that, but it was a 33-story anthology of 520pp when many were 192pp and in those 33 stories (amidst, admittedly, some lesser New Wavy blather) are a lot of excellent ones. The first 7 and last 4 are solid or better, and then there's good PKD, Niven, Leiber, Emshwiller, and Sturgeon between. Emshwiller's "Sex and/or Mr. Morrison" and Spinrad's "Carcinoma Angels" are really good. It was intended to push the boundaries of things and, while those boundaries aren't all that impressive today and had already mostly fallen even then, there was and is still a bit of subversive glee to it which helped generate some of the reaction to it. One thing I really like about it (perhaps aided by Ellison's own '50s-era tween-ness) is that it was promoting the younger 60s crowd while still including a healthy dose of older masters so wasn't really the generation-war anthology it could have been. Anyway, it was well worth reading for me but I get how it comes off as "Thou Shalt Read This Greatest Anthology of All-Time" and almost nothing is really that.

(And Ellison should have been ridden out of the industry on a rail for stealing dozens of stories for decades in the ludicrous fiasco that was (not) "Last Dangerous Visions.")
 
I finished Adrian Tchaikovsky's Bear Head this morning and like Dogs of War, I found it to be an excellent and thought provoking read.

Now on to Neal Asher's Lockdown Tales.
 
Last edited:
I recently did something I haven't done in years - I went to a local used bookshop and picked a book I had never heard of.

It is Out of this World by Lawrence Watt-Evans. It's a light, fun story of an ordinary man from modern US who finds himself and his family pulled into an adventure involving interdimensional travel between a world of sword and sorcery and a cheesy sci fi Galactic Empire. I am not familiar with this author, but I'm enjoying the story.
 
I'm reading Rankin's Dead Man's Chest: Travels After Robert Louis Stevenson in connection with a revisiting of RLS in which I've read again "Olalla," "The Body-Snatcher," "Markheim," "The Isle of Voices," and "Thrawn Janet," and read "The Merry Men" for the first time. I also reread the Stevenson section of Holmes's Footsteps. All of this reading enjoyable. Stepping down a bit, in terms of literary craftsmanship, I've also reading ERB's Tarzan and the Jewels of Opar, after someone recently wrote appreciatively about ERB. Also launched on a commentary by Brighton on the book of Revelation. And more!
1630167870926.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top