Sci-Fi/Fantasy stories without human characters

The early Narnia books only feature between 1 and 4 visiting humans (plus the ice queen, I suppose), although later, Caspian etc onward they have more.

Going further back in my life, there are no humans in Moomin Valley, although the lives and reactions of the moomins are very human like.

The central section of Asimov's The Gods Themselves is set in a universe without humans, although the 1st and 3rd sections are based on earth.
 
Cont.
Stories for little ones, featuring talking animals, plants and even houses and mountains. Have been around longer than civilisation.

Aesop gives us animals and birds, Uncle Remus offers Br'er rabbit, coyotes and roadrunners have no need for humans apart from ACME mail delivery. Certainly the stories tend to be very short, partly because a part of their soporific function towards infants, further diluted with illustrations, and far from all of them are exclusively non-human. Some of Kipling's Just So Stories are exclusively animal, like the Elephant's child or the armadillo, while The Butterfly who Stamped or the rhinoceros' skin do rely on Solomon, or the Parsee man with his mirror hat are essential to the plot, while the first letter is completely human.

I suspect the hunter/gatherers in the great Rift Valley were telling both animal and hybrid takers to their young, imbued with morals, and, since sci-fi wasn't yet popular they were almost bound to be fantasy.

Being capable of writing believable human characters is still a worthwhile skill for anyone intending to write science fiction, though.
 
Far-Seer Trilogy by Robert J Sawyer


Dinosaur versions of Galileo, Newton & Darwin.

God shows up just to alleviate boredom.

I think this trilogy is far less popular than it should be probably because it is just so unknown.
There was a character modeled on Freud also.
But female instead.

That must be why I forgot. LOL
 
Are they? I thought it wasn't set on Earth
A bit irrelevant surely - most epic fantasy is set on other worlds, and all involve humans (Game of Thrones, Belgariad, Memory Sorrow and Thorn, Mistborn, Magician, Recluse, Dragonworld, Discworld, Wheel of Time, one could go on and on).
 
One of my favourites is 9, a movie about sentient rag dolls in a post-apocalyptic wasteland who are hunted by robotic creatures that suck out their souls.
 
A bit irrelevant surely - most epic fantasy is set on other worlds, and all involve humans (Game of Thrones, Belgariad, Memory Sorrow and Thorn, Mistborn, Magician, Recluse, Dragonworld, Discworld, Wheel of Time, one could go on and on).
In Terry Brooks' "Shannara" series, all the non-supernatural humanoid species except Elves are descended from present-day Earth humans. Dwarves, Gnomes, Trolls.... and Men. Makes you wonder why the Men still get to be called human but no-one else does....
 
As Fiberglass Cyborg indicates, Greg Egan's good for this. While not as extreme as the Orthogonal Trilogy, which is set in a universe constructed by entirely different laws, Incandescence deals with a non-human species trying to figure out the nature of their world and even things like Diaspora have no humans, strictly, though that's playing with the net down a little as some of the post-humans come in a couple of varieties of descendants of humans.
 
"First Cycle" by H. Beam Piper would fit this, it's primarily about 2 planets of non-human aliens. Though some humans come in at the very end, they're not part of the main throughline of the plot such as it is.
 
There's Redwall by Brian Jacques, and the connecting series, if you don't mind children's novels.

There are a couple short stories, like Isaac Asimov's "Youth," and A. Bertram Chandler's "Giant Killer," where the characters are suspected humans, with twists revealing they're not.

Then there's "A Dream of a Thousand Cats" by Neil Gaiman, but it's in comic book form. It's in the volume Dream Country.

Another children's novel: The Mouse and His Child.
 
Last edited:
As a reader, I always consider that characters who look like and think like and act and bleed like humans are for all intents and purposes humans whether they are inhabitants of another world or not. But in an SFF novel, things that superficially resemble humans may be something quite different. In folklore, there are any number of (usually quite dangerous) beings that appear human at first glance, but there is always some small detail that gives them away (supposing the human who encounters them notices that detail in time).

At the same time, I think it takes more than pointy ears to make an elf (or whatever). There should be more significant differences from humans or the story becomes little more than a masquerade party where all the characters are humans dressed up as something else. In LOTR, for instance, all the elves we meet are very, very old, though they don't look it. Even Legolas, who is apparently rather young as elves go, at one point refers to the other members of the Fellowship as "children" and characters like Elrond and Galadriel behave as they do because they have lived through so many ages of the world and have seen the same mistakes made over and over with disastrous results by their kith and kin, so that by the time we meet them in LOTR, they know well the bitter consequences of giving in to the temptations of power. Readers who only read LOTR and The Hobbit, and not the Silmarillion or the HOME books, may come away with the idea that the elves are naturally wise and noble, when the truth is that the ones we meet are merely experienced and such wisdom as they have has been hard-won, while the reckless and the greedy ones have suffered the fatal consequences of their own mistakes long, long ago (in the process providing object lessons for the ones who remain). Humans are inherently neither better nor worse than elves, but they don't have the benefit of the long view which the elven characters in the book have gained because of their extensive life span.

In Watership Down, as another example, the rabbits think enough like humans that we can identify with them and what they go through, and yet they have as well their distinctively rabbity concerns that set them apart from humans. They also have certain limitations in their thinking, like not being able to count past four (it goes something like this: "one, two, three, four, [gasp] a thousand") thus, the character whose name is translated as Fiver might not actually be the fifth-born in his family (as the smallest in a litter of at least five his actual name in the rabbits' language is "little thousand"). This inability to comprehend large numbers is a danger to them in striking out into unfamiliar territory and unfamiliar situations. They may not, therefore, be exactly rabbits, but they certainly are not humans.
 
I suppose Olaf Stapledons Star Maker might fit in here. The main protagonist and narrator is a disemobodied human psyche but otherwise it fills the bill as the narrator merely acts a s a vehicle to deliver the story.
 
It just occurred to me that

There Will Come Soft Rains
by Ray Bradbury

meets this qualification.
There is a dog but it dies.
 
Is it possible to cheat on this question?

What about The City and the Stars by Arthur C. Clarke? The setting is so far in the future that the descendants of humans are significantly different. Are they still human?

Rescue Party Clarke's first published story.
Aliens come to Earth and do not find anyone. The story ends without humans becoming part of the tale though the aliens are about to contact the human space ships.
 
If the definition of 'human' is to act, think. look and/or talk like one, I would imagine that it would be very difficult to read and understand. a bit like looking at hieroglyphics without being able to translate them.
 

Back
Top