I'm a little embarrassed about this. I like the things you say about the books you read. But I do agree that at least the last one or two books you've reviewed positively and I've then taken it upon myself to read, because what you say sounds very good to me, I haven't clicked with. But please do not stop reviewing what you've been reading. I do rather wonder if it works the opposite way as well. Have you read something that I loved, but you didn't? Two books I think very highly of (rare 5 stars from me) would be Ender's Game and All Systems Red (The Murderbot Diaries), maybe you feel something else about them.
Oh crikey, it's not an embarrassment not seeing eye to eye with me on something, it's probably a cause for merriment and a glass of wine.
As it happens, I did very much like
Ender's Game and
All System's Red, and I enjoyed the first few
Honor Harrington books just fine, which I know you enjoy, so in a Venn diagram of our SF proclivities, our circles do overlap somewhat, just not nearly as much as with some other members here - whose reputations I won't undermine by naming!
My aim in reviewing fiction is to be (i) consistent, (ii) honest and (iii) clear. If folk know what I like and don't like they can then probably judge from the review whether they'd like it or not, regardless of whether I did. But then, I think most on here do that, and do a nice job. I often read reviews here and either pick up a book or don't based on what members have to say - sometimes it's because I know I share tastes with the reviewer, but sometimes I go 180 because I know I like what the reviewer doesn't like about it.
I have begun The Calculating Stars by Mary Robinette Kowall. It is the first of an alternate timeline stories in "A Lady Astronaut Novel" series. I always struggle with books propose an alternate timeline in the past, and this one starts right after World War II with "President Dewey" but so far the story is making up for my immediate frowns on what has "supposed" to have happened.
But yeah, I don't think I care for this, so if you like it, it will probably belong in that majority category in the Venn diagram called 'books we don't agree on'. So... you may love it. I'll be interested to hear anyway.