Is this Google AI Engineer Crazy or Not?

[Elentarri]

I can guarentee that the Google AI is the one that is going to go bonkers, if it spends any amount of time with the "general public" (where logic and common sense is almost extinct).

 

[Christine Wheelwright]

I can guarentee that the Google AI is the one that is going to go bonkers, if it spends any amount of time with the "general public" (where logic and common sense is almost extinct).

Could be the basis for an interesting short story.

 

[Elentarri]

Could be the basis for an interesting short story.

Indeed! However, the only things I've ever written are a thesis and a whole bunch of boring technical reports. So, someone with more creativity and better writing skills needs to tackle that.

 

[Mark_Harbinger]

Crazy or not? was how this was framed. I don't believe anyone has actually linked to an interview with the subject-in-question. Here's one:

 

[Robert Zwilling]

The interview certainly changes the whole conversation about AI development for me.

All the noise about it being human is blocking out the question of how the chatbots are being programed to interact with people when giving advice to people.

By not involving people who are not technologically connected to the system, their input, if there is any, is reliant on third party sources. Hardly reliable and liable to preconceptions.

The programs are set up for the chatbot to always deny it is a living entity. If there was just one rule, or even 3 rules of how it answers "sensitive" questions, that would be one thing, but I would guess that it has a substantial catalog of politically correct answers to an awful lot of questions.