Simple Question.

Given how many writers on how many subjects there have been over the past three thousand years or so, I'm shocked more when I *have* heard of someone. <grin>
I read his Wikipedia entry. He was famous in scientific circles, but he was also a Marxist/socialist so mentions of him would tend to get swept under the rug in free America.
 
I read his Wikipedia entry. He was famous in scientific circles, but he was also a Marxist/socialist so mentions of him would tend to get swept under the rug in free America.
That's hilarious. Ok, so we must ignore all scientific work by marxists, socialists, communists, nazis, corporations, paid for by corporations, paid for by government, done in them thar liberal universities...Have I missed a group?

What could this guy possibly know about a jack-ass? Or a Liger! A Zorse?

Who are the approved scientists? Must be a tiny list.
 
If you're in the field--whatever field--you're more likely to hear of a person than if not. How many here know who Marc Bloch was? David Herlihy? Herbert Butterfield? This isn't a matter of concealing anything, or it would not be on Wikipedia. It's there for all to see ... if they look.

There's lots of stuff in the world. It's divided into stuff I've heard of and stuff I haven't.
 
I am shocked that I never heard of this guy:

Daedalus; or, Science and the future
by J. B. S. Haldane
Bertrand Russell had an answer to this book
Icarus - Or The Future of Science



 
If you go down the list of "domain, kingdom, phylum (plural, phyla), class, order, family, genus (plural, genera), and species," The one on the end is the last solid point at which we can differentiate. The upper ones are differentiated by cellular mechanisms, but species is where the buck stops because "either you can breed with it or you can't." There are edge cases like mules and tigons, but that's just a sputtering between a broken link.

The whole thing is just called "speciation." It's the process by which two lines of genome become incapable of combining into a new offspring. There are clear breakages, like when primate chromosomes 2 and 3 fused into human chromosome 2, making 1-to-1 combination impossible. There are gradual breakages like the Ensatina Salamanders, where the genome shifts in a gradient and contiguous salamanders can always breed, but then the ends of the gradient meet and they can't.

In a classic case of in-group exposure bias, humans have attempted to further sub-divide Homo Sapiens Sapiens, but it's all moot because we can interbreed. We could interbreed with the Neanderthals, so all humans are WAY within speciation limits, and it would take hundreds of thousands of years of isolation for a species divide to take place.
 
Interspecific hybrids are bred by mating individuals from two species, normally from within the same genus. The offspring display traits and characteristics of both parents, but are often sterile, preventing gene flow between the species

So maybe you could call them Genuses; because it doesn't sound all that smart a choice to me;.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top