Christine Wheelwright
Well-Known Member
Agreed. Downward To The Earth is everything Avatar wanted to be. I would place it among the great SF novels.Brilliant novel. I read it for the first time two or three years ago.
Agreed. Downward To The Earth is everything Avatar wanted to be. I would place it among the great SF novels.Brilliant novel. I read it for the first time two or three years ago.
I couldn't believe just how good it was.Agreed. Downward To The Earth is everything Avatar wanted to be. I would place it among the great SF novels.
I haven't yet read this book Parson, but I've looked at the online blurbs and it does (somehow) seem very familiar, so much so that I get a "I'm sure that I've read it already" Spidey tingle.But 10 percent into the book it sounds like something I've read before
it sounds like something I've read before, and I'm sure I haven't
Probably ripped off the plot/premise, with minor differences, from some other book you've both read. I seem to be seeing that rather more often these daysI get a "I'm sure that I've read it already" Spidey tingle.
I haven't yet read this book Parson, but I've looked at the online blurbs and it does (somehow) seem very familiar, so much so that I get a "I'm sure that I've read it already" Spidey tingle.
Probably ripped off the plot/premise, with minor differences, from some other book you've both read. I seem to be seeing that rather more often these days
I think this is perfectly valid criticism and of course Tchaikovsky was a fantasy author before turning to SF (and more recently back to fantasy again) so not too surprising to see him mixing it up a bit. I quite enjoyed the frustrations of the 'elder' scientist trying to explain things in terms that weren't inevitably interpreted by the rest as magic. He was sort of having fun with Clarke's old saying that sufficiently advanced technology will be indistinguishable from magic.I also failed to mention that I finished Elder Race by Adrian Tchaikovsky and this was a very good book. I'd give it a strong 4 stars. But I couldn't shake the feeling that this was actually a Fantasy book masquerading as a S.F. Other than the scientific basis for what the "wizard" did this was a Fantasy. And as the science was never described only assumed. You could change the Science out for spells and you have the same book. It was by far my least favorite book by Tchaikovsky.
Note that Murakami wasn't even well known at this time but clearly he had read some Pratchett!The “world”—the word always makes me think of a tortoise and elephants tirelessly supporting a gigantic disc. The elephants have no knowledge of the tortoise’s role, the tortoise unable to see what the elephants are doing. And neither is the least aware of the world on their backs.
Excellent.I'm am currently reading Haruki Murakami's A Wild Sheep Chase (and loving it) and I came across the below passage which made me laugh out loud. I wasn't sure where to post this; Pratchett's sub forum somehow doesn't seem right, maybe the "Makes you smile...." thread but again doesn't quite feel right either. So as I'm reading it now I've put it here.
In this Japanese author's book, only later translated into English I found this short passage:
Note that Murakami wasn't even well known at this time but clearly he had read some Pratchett!
Yes, the invention precedes Pratchett. It's a common myth, for instance see:Excellent.
Didn’t Pratchett take this from some ancient flat-earth cosmology?