I’m in the process of taking my A levels, rather belatedly, and so most of my reading has been dictated by my English Lit course lately, as well as History.
This month I finished ‘The Major of Casterbridge’ by Thomas Hardy, and I’m also reading a biography on the man himself by Michael Millgate. ‘Casterbridge’ was a great read if you enjoy a more classic literary style, but also a nicely paced plot, I felt. Powerful, solemn, but not without sections of that delightful pastoral prose I relished in ‘Tess’. The biography is fascinating, although I have to be very switched on to absorb more academic works. I’m building the stamina for it though.
I’m now re-reading ‘Women’ by Bukowski, which I’ve chosen to compare and contrast with the Hardy novel for my coursework. Racey and very explicitly pornographic, not to mention misogynistic, it’s an exciting example Bukowski’s relentless, conversational style, but of course raises lots of issues, probably today even more than when published.
With regard to SF and fantasy I’m reading a little Michael Moorcock, finishing the Elric stories I’d neglected from the Orion Stormbringer omnibus. Not sure there’s much less misogyny here than the Bukowski… but vampiric swords and a magical decaying landscapes bring some escapist respite after the more heavy literature!
On the subject of misogyny, it can be part and parcel of pulp fiction unfortunately... Some might say Bukowski isn’t far from this category in fact. I wonder, how do you guys feel about those older pulp fantasy and SF books where female characters tend to be included largely for the sake of their anatomical description…?