Dave Vicks
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2020
- Messages
- 1,730
I have on deck a Jack Finney novel.
And the Comic book TO MUCH COFFEE MAN.
And the Comic book TO MUCH COFFEE MAN.
I still have it, the paperback edition that I got by means of a classroom "book club" in (probably) eighth grade. This would have been not just one of my first novels read, but one of the first books of any sort that I chose for myself. It looks like this:Crickey, yes, we may define the upper and lower bounds of pleasantness regards the events that surround the book’s first reading. All others probably lie somewhere in between. Answers on a postcard from anyone who feels they can extend the range either below the lower bound or above the upper bound. This could become quite an interesting sub-discussion.
I never owned Hound until about a decade ago, but I read a library copy when I was about 13. Now, I have the Klinger annotated set along with Penguin editions.I still have it, the paperback edition that I got by means of a classroom "book club" in (probably) eighth grade. This would have been not just one of my first novels read, but one of the first books of any sort that I chose for myself. It looks like this:
View attachment 96459
I suppose that, around the time I got that book, my personal book library contained a few Tolkien paperbacks, a few Lancer reprints from Marvel comics, one or two of Blish's Star Trek teleplay retellings, and ... boy, not much more, aside from a few books that had been given to me at various times in youngsterhood.
Holmes' hat doesn't look exactly like a deerstalker on that cover, Extollager (peaks too short and no ear flaps). Conan Doyle never placed a deerstalker on his head, of course (a reference to an "ear-flapped travelling cap" in Silver Blaze is the closest such description. It's interesting the image strikes the right impression on your book though - we've become very used to what Holmes should look like (Basil Rathbone or Jeremy Brett in a long coat and a deerstalker, basically).I still have it, the paperback edition that I got by means of a classroom "book club" in (probably) eighth grade. This would have been not just one of my first novels read, but one of the first books of any sort that I chose for myself. It looks like this:
View attachment 96459
I've got that as an ebook in my TBR file, it's been there a long, long time.I’ve begun a late Victorian novel credited to Maxwell Grey (the author was a woman whose name I forget and didn’t recognize), The Silence of Dean Maitland
I've got that as an ebook in my TBR file, it's been there a long, long time.
Written by a Mary Tuttiet.
I'll be interested in your thoughts on it.....as in, read it or delete it
I have a book of Peake's nonsense poems which is really fun. A bit Lewis Carrolish.I read Mervyn Peake's Vast Alchemies by G Peter Winnington. Unsurprisingly, it's a biography of Peake. It's very informative and well-written, even if it could have been a bit longer. My main thoughts on reading it are just how talented and unlucky Peake was: not just in his illness, but in his art often seeming to be slightly out of fashion. He was an extremely good artist and seems to have been a great poet too, although I find his poetry a little hard going. Really, Peake ought to be recognised as the second greatest fantasy author: this book goes some way to rescuing him from being just a "gothic" curiosity.
I'll assume you mean "second greatest fantasy author of the 20th century" after Tolkien. That's a thesis that could be defended strongly.I read Mervyn Peake's Vast Alchemies by G Peter Winnington. Unsurprisingly, it's a biography of Peake. It's very informative and well-written, even if it could have been a bit longer. My main thoughts on reading it are just how talented and unlucky Peake was: not just in his illness, but in his art often seeming to be slightly out of fashion. He was an extremely good artist and seems to have been a great poet too, although I find his poetry a little hard going. Really, Peake ought to be recognised as the second greatest fantasy author: this book goes some way to rescuing him from being just a "gothic" curiosity.
I'll assume you mean "second greatest fantasy author of the 20th century" after Tolkien. That's a thesis that could be defended strongly.