To write with dice (as I understand it), the dice produce a series of prompts from which to write a story. It is, therefore, completely different from writing with dice because it's the exact opposite with AI. The 'musician' creates a series of prompts and the AI does all the real work. When writing with dice, the writer still needs to know how to create a narrative structure from the prompts and still needs to have the skill to write in an interesting and entertaining way.
When people say they wrote a song using AI, they don't need to know anything about music (although no doubt some will) and claim to have written a song with next to zero input. They don't need to know anything about melody, chords, keys or scales. I'm sure it will all be built into the AI.
I'm not against the use of AI as such but I think there should be a legal requirement for it to be declared on publication. People have the right to know if a song was created by a real musician (and some song compositions take years to mature) or if it was created in a few seconds by AI - because I still stand by my point that the person inputting the prompts did not create the music coming out, he/she merely gave the AI guidelines and it is the software that is the true author.
When people say they wrote a song using AI, they don't need to know anything about music (although no doubt some will) and claim to have written a song with next to zero input. They don't need to know anything about melody, chords, keys or scales. I'm sure it will all be built into the AI.
I'm not against the use of AI as such but I think there should be a legal requirement for it to be declared on publication. People have the right to know if a song was created by a real musician (and some song compositions take years to mature) or if it was created in a few seconds by AI - because I still stand by my point that the person inputting the prompts did not create the music coming out, he/she merely gave the AI guidelines and it is the software that is the true author.