The Helliconia Trilogy by Brian Aldiss

Stephen Palmer

author of books
Supporter
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Messages
6,539
Location
Shropshire
1000005393.jpg


I first read this trilogy as the books were being published in the early 1980s. Recently, I re-read them. Chronners may know that I think of this work at the top of the SF tree, though it's not perfect. Yet for vision, grandeur, inventiveness and audacity there's nothing really to match it, except The Book Of The New Sun and Dune.
The set up is this. An ageing G4 star with planets, one of which sustains life, is captured by an 11-million-year-old white supergiant, so that the former starts orbiting the latter. This entirely changes the course of evolution on the life-bearing planet. Aldiss' trilogy takes three points on the 1825-year Great Year, when winter's ice starts melting, the burning chaos of summer, and the powerfully gloomy descent into another great winter, and within them tells three tales.
Helliconia Spring relates the story of the impoverished residents of Oldorando at the equator, where centuries of ice and snow begin melting. Though the vast scale of the planet and its myriad of life forms dominates, the scale of the human-like (identical, basically) characters, with their petty jealously, anger, lust and desire for power, makes an awesome contrast. These are tiny people living in a huge environment.
The humans aren't the only characters, however. Before the stellar capture, an alien race, the phagors, ruled the planet. Amongst SF's best aliens, the phagors' eotemporal minds, recalling the catastrophe of the stellar capture, all hate the "recently arrived" humans, who in former times were their hominid-like pets. The interplay between humans and phagors is one of the forces of enantiodroma, things turning into their opposites, which drives the complex and engaging plot.

1000005395.jpg

Now it is summer, when the planet is closest to the white supergiant. The ice-loving, antifreeze-blooded phagors are in retreat, confined to their stratosphere-grazing High Nyktryk mountains. Human beings are free to fight wars, have affairs, hate their fathers, miss their sons, and in general do all the petty, irrational things human beings are so good at. But all this is being watched by the Earth humans of an interstellar expansion from thousands of years ago, including Billy Xiao Pin, who's won the Helliconia Lottery, allowing him to go down to the planet’s surface. Because of the hellico virus, however, which physically transforms Helliconia's humans in preparation for warmth and for cold (bone fever & the fat death) his win is a death sentence.
Meanwhile, the King of Borlien is about to divorce his wife in order to marry a young nearly-human girl, a dynastic marriage that he believes will save his country. Chaos ensues...

1000005394.jpg

The great planet is descending into a centuries-long winter. In northerly Sibornal, the autocratic Oligarch is making increasingly more drastic laws to "protect" his people from the plague - the fat death, as it's called at this time of the Great Year. In Kharnabhar, high in the mountains, we meet our hero, son of the Keeper Of The Wheel, an immense subterranean religious machine of stone and metal chains. Yet the Keeper's son is caught up in these draconian measures, and tries to sidestep the laws and outwit his father. In doing so, he reveals the horror of his own family, and the lengths some people believe they must go to in order to survive at a latitude where, for three and a half centuries, the white sun will never rise above the horizon.

It's impossible to convey the majesty of these books in a few sentences. In a sense, there are two stories to the trilogy, one of the humans and their lives, interacting with one another and with the phagors, the other of the planet itself. Aldiss, inspired by the then recent and paradigm-busting Gaia Hypothesis of James Lovelock, invented a Helliconian equivalent, which the inhabitants know of via their religious lives. Lovelock would have been annoyed by the association, but there's no doubting it's power and efficacy when it comes to this exceptional work of fiction.
The trilogy isn't perfect. Some of the prose is a tad clumsy, there's head-hopping and other flaws, but as a whole the work is stunning, highly readable, complex, fascinating and marvellous. Its sheer joi de vivre carries it along: the fruitful multiplicity of life as it evolves, the interaction between climate and life, and between geology and life. All this is witnessed by tiny human characters as they live out their tiny lives, dwarfed by the grandeur of the planet which brought them into being.
 
I remember enjoying these books when they first came out but I did find them a little exhausting to read. I think I have low stamina when it comes to reading and like to do it in frequent, short bursts (a chapter at a time is good for me). From what I recall, the prologue in Helliconia Spring was something like 92 pages long. This gave me a problem as it was a lot for me to read in one sitting and there was no comfortable jumping off point. Perhaps I need to take some reading steroids...

That all being said, I concur. Definitely worth a read.:)
 
I remember enjoying these books when they first came out but I did find them a little exhausting to read. I think I have low stamina when it comes to reading and like to do it in frequent, short bursts (a chapter at a time is good for me). From what I recall, the prologue in Helliconia Spring was something like 92 pages long. This gave me a problem as it was a lot for me to read in one sitting and there was no comfortable jumping off point. Perhaps I need to take some reading steroids...

That all being said, I concur. Definitely worth a read.:)
I read all three in one fell swoop last year for the first time. (The SF Classics line bundles all three books into one tome and....when I write 'swoop'...I probably took 5-6 weeks. Mostly reading on the gym treadmill, so my right forearm got a bit of an extra workout holding the book up!)

I like Aldiss, there's a degree of eccentricity to his work that is all his own. And his Helliconia Trilogy is monumental and highly ambitious.

Is it up there with the greatest SF of all time?

IMO no.

It's very good and well worth a read if you like and fancy a chunky science fantasy. Aldiss's grappling with an entire alien biosphere is the core of the book, as we go through Helliconia's great year, describing the environmental and biological conditions the extremes of the planet's orbit experiences around its binary stars.

But I think the singular narratives for each season (ignoring the prologue in Spring which leads into the main plot) can be a bit stodgy and slow. Think fantasy soap opera. Spring has probably the most satisfying narrative arc, while Summer for me dragged quite a lot. The thread of the observers from Earth that goes through all three books is weaker - they are generally there at the start for Aldiss to have a simple way to get some hardcore exposition in. He does have a parallel development of these people over the time period, but it comes across as a bit of an afterthought or sideshow; Helliconia is the main prize here.
 
Read them as a teen, but definitely enjoyed them and the fascinating biology of the planet.
 
View attachment 121683

I first read this trilogy as the books were being published in the early 1980s. Recently, I re-read them. Chronners may know that I think of this work at the top of the SF tree, though it's not perfect. Yet for vision, grandeur, inventiveness and audacity there's nothing really to match it, except The Book Of The New Sun and Dune.
The set up is this. An ageing G4 star with planets, one of which sustains life, is captured by an 11-million-year-old white supergiant, so that the former starts orbiting the latter. This entirely changes the course of evolution on the life-bearing planet. Aldiss' trilogy takes three points on the 1825-year Great Year, when winter's ice starts melting, the burning chaos of summer, and the powerfully gloomy descent into another great winter, and within them tells three tales.
Helliconia Spring relates the story of the impoverished residents of Oldorando at the equator, where centuries of ice and snow begin melting. Though the vast scale of the planet and its myriad of life forms dominates, the scale of the human-like (identical, basically) characters, with their petty jealously, anger, lust and desire for power, makes an awesome contrast. These are tiny people living in a huge environment.
The humans aren't the only characters, however. Before the stellar capture, an alien race, the phagors, ruled the planet. Amongst SF's best aliens, the phagors' eotemporal minds, recalling the catastrophe of the stellar capture, all hate the "recently arrived" humans, who in former times were their hominid-like pets. The interplay between humans and phagors is one of the forces of enantiodroma, things turning into their opposites, which drives the complex and engaging plot.

View attachment 121684
Now it is summer, when the planet is closest to the white supergiant. The ice-loving, antifreeze-blooded phagors are in retreat, confined to their stratosphere-grazing High Nyktryk mountains. Human beings are free to fight wars, have affairs, hate their fathers, miss their sons, and in general do all the petty, irrational things human beings are so good at. But all this is being watched by the Earth humans of an interstellar expansion from thousands of years ago, including Billy Xiao Pin, who's won the Helliconia Lottery, allowing him to go down to the planet’s surface. Because of the hellico virus, however, which physically transforms Helliconia's humans in preparation for warmth and for cold (bone fever & the fat death) his win is a death sentence.
Meanwhile, the King of Borlien is about to divorce his wife in order to marry a young nearly-human girl, a dynastic marriage that he believes will save his country. Chaos ensues...

View attachment 121686
The great planet is descending into a centuries-long winter. In northerly Sibornal, the autocratic Oligarch is making increasingly more drastic laws to "protect" his people from the plague - the fat death, as it's called at this time of the Great Year. In Kharnabhar, high in the mountains, we meet our hero, son of the Keeper Of The Wheel, an immense subterranean religious machine of stone and metal chains. Yet the Keeper's son is caught up in these draconian measures, and tries to sidestep the laws and outwit his father. In doing so, he reveals the horror of his own family, and the lengths some people believe they must go to in order to survive at a latitude where, for three and a half centuries, the white sun will never rise above the horizon.

It's impossible to convey the majesty of these books in a few sentences. In a sense, there are two stories to the trilogy, one of the humans and their lives, interacting with one another and with the phagors, the other of the planet itself. Aldiss, inspired by the then recent and paradigm-busting Gaia Hypothesis of James Lovelock, invented a Helliconian equivalent, which the inhabitants know of via their religious lives. Lovelock would have been annoyed by the association, but there's no doubting it's power and efficacy when it comes to this exceptional work of fiction.
The trilogy isn't perfect. Some of the prose is a tad clumsy, there's head-hopping and other flaws, but as a whole the work is stunning, highly readable, complex, fascinating and marvellous. Its sheer joi de vivre carries it along: the fruitful multiplicity of life as it evolves, the interaction between climate and life, and between geology and life. All this is witnessed by tiny human characters as they live out their tiny lives, dwarfed by the grandeur of the planet which brought them into being.
'Clumsy prose', for me, describes it well.
 
Yes, there are a few clunky sentences that really shouldn't have got past the editor. I also agree that the middle volume is a tad long, I skipped a couple of "this is how the battle went" sections. I've also read before people saying that the opening Yuli section of the first volume is too long; personally I found that evocative and thrilling.
I suppose it's really the imaginative feat which is so extraordinary. I'm on record here as saying that writers spend too much time worrying about technique and not enough about imagination. Helliconia is a great example of how that might work in practice.
 
This one's been on my longlist for a while. Not sure whether this review has bumped it up or down the list. Definitely have more of a sense of what I'd expect though.
 
I've heard a few things said about this book. It's been called too hard to read and things like that. But everyone has different tastes, and some people prefer to eat tasteless porridge, and others prefer nuts, which are tasty but hard to chew. I think it is the same with literature.
According to this review, the book is really something epic. I really like The Book of the New Sun and Dune. It's quite possible that I'll read this one too, and your review really encourages me to do so.
I was most interested in Bone Fever & the Fat Death. As I understand it, in this trilogy the people of Helliconia don't so much change the world around them as try to adapt to it themselves, like hares and squirrels changing colour with the new season, or bears putting on fat before hibernation. The phagors also seem very interesting.
I read another book by this author, The Malacia Tapestry, about a city-state and a forest with ancestral animals (i.e. dinosaurs). The plot was a bit strange, but the book was very well written.
 
This one's been on my longlist for a while. Not sure whether this review has bumped it up or down the list. Definitely have more of a sense of what I'd expect though.
If I can add one more positive thing to look out for. You've got to read it just for Aldiss's long list of short euphemisms for sex. Don't worry, no vast bad sex paragraphs here, just some hilarious one liners.
 
I remember i started to read Helliconia Spring a few years ago, i enjoyed it, but put it down and for some reason, never picked it up again.
 
I read them many years ago and enjoyed them but found them quite hard going; quite a slow burn. I also feel they are really more fantasy than SF. The human observers felt to me, and it sounds like @Stephen Palmer felt similarly, rather dropped in so it could be called SF not F. As I say it was many years ago but my memories of it make me suspect it is very much a book of it's time, which I have to say I have found to be the case with each of the several Aldiss books I have read in recent years; they felt dated to me. With all that said I do distinctly remember feeling I wanted another book back in the day; though that might just have been that they were named after the seasons but there were only three! I also have a vague memory that some of his planetary mechanics didn't quite add up but I don't have sufficient memory of them to defend that statement! I think it might have been something to do with the fact that the orbit of the planet around star 1 seemed to stay stable even when close to star 2 which, at the distances involved, would have been unlikely. Really it all depends on whether you are looking for hard SF, fantasy or something in between.

I think the (similar) planetary scenario as described in The Three Body Problem was probably more scientifically realistic in that the cycle of seasons becomes effectively almost unpredictable.
 
I read them many years ago and enjoyed them but found them quite hard going; quite a slow burn. I also feel they are really more fantasy than SF. The human observers felt to me, and it sounds like @Stephen Palmer felt similarly, rather dropped in so it could be called SF not F. As I say it was many years ago but my memories of it make me suspect it is very much a book of it's time, which I have to say I have found to be the case with each of the several Aldiss books I have read in recent years; they felt dated to me. With all that said I do distinctly remember feeling I wanted another book back in the day; though that might just have been that they were named after the seasons but there were only three! I also have a vague memory that some of his planetary mechanics didn't quite add up but I don't have sufficient memory of them to defend that statement! I think it might have been something to do with the fact that the orbit of the planet around star 1 seemed to stay stable even when close to star 2 which, at the distances involved, would have been unlikely. Really it all depends on whether you are looking for hard SF, fantasy or something in between.

I think the (similar) planetary scenario as described in The Three Body Problem was probably more scientifically realistic in that the cycle of seasons becomes effectively almost unpredictable.
It's definitely what I would call a "science fantasy". (The Book of the New Sun is IMHO a better book that can be described as such.)

However, as for the orbital mechanics...I don't know if Aldiss got his system checked out with a proper simulation. (There should be some sandboxes that might be able to test it today.)

But, in his defence, no, nothing like three body. Actually I have far more problems with 3-body than Helliconia, but I'll leave that to the end.

In Helliconia Star B 'Batalix' has a long comet-like orbit around star A 'Freyr'. It's closest approach is 230 AU, it's furthest 720 AU. For comparison the distance between the Sun and Pluto is about 39 AU. Freyr is a massive hot star of about 14 solar masses, Batalix is slightly smaller than the Sun. The planets that orbit Batalix are all in the range 0.3-1.3 AU.

So Helliconia is relatively tightly bound to Batalix, so it seems to me, on first glance, reasonable that the seasons 1) work the way they do 2) are regular. But, over time regular orbits of Batalix around Freyr could continually nudge the orbits of the planets, leading them to go into different orbits - actually probably getting ripped off and sent into deep space. However Aldiss gets round this by:

Making his binary star system very young. Batalix was captured by Freyr a million years ago - virtually no time at all in astronomical terms. So the 'nudges' that might take the planets around Batalix into other orbits have had barely any time to act on them.

----

For the 3-body problem, Alpha Centauri's stars orbit at between 11-35.6 AU between each other (AB). Planets have been detected in the system, although it should be pointed out that the best evidenced planets are around Proxima Centauri (C), which although gravitationally bound, only gets at closest ~4200 AU from the main pair. Currently sits about 12,000 AU away.

Planets with life orbiting C seem reasonable. They seem less likely to be impacted by AB as they are quite a distance away. Planets around AB are certainly possible, but I think only if they are pretty close to their parent stars. Planets further out in the main system would likely be flung out by the stars motions.

So where are the Trisolarians in this system? The book seems to imply that their around AB somehow. But that's going to be a very bad place for life to thrive in (never mind an actual civilisation develop.) I don't buy it as viable. They could be around C...but then they probably wouldn't be experiencing the huge changes in climate that they experience.

TL;DR Aldiss' Hellicania makes more sense that Cixin's Alpha Centauri from the viewpoint of its planets and life. :giggle:
 
I've read this series twice now. While I enjoy and get into the stories of the various characters that are written about over the long Helliconian year, I can't help feeling that they are really sub-plots to the over-arching main story - that of the cycle of life and the way it sustains itself over the difficult conditions imposed by their strange solar cycles.

I think a central point that Aldiss was trying to make with this trilogy is that human life (in Helliconia) seems to be at first in a so much more precarious position than that of humanity back on earth when in the end we find that, in the long term, it is actually the reverse and more stable. And that is because humanity is better integrated with nature on Helliconia than it is on Earth, perhaps because humanity is prevented from becoming too far technologically advanced to such an extent that they can actually disrupt the natural balance.

Unfortunately, humanity has to nearly wiped out every 2500 years (and what's left enslaved to the Phagors) in order to maintain that balance...
 
It's definitely what I would call a "science fantasy". (The Book of the New Sun is IMHO a better book that can be described as such.)

However, as for the orbital mechanics...I don't know if Aldiss got his system checked out with a proper simulation. (There should be some sandboxes that might be able to test it today.)

But, in his defence, no, nothing like three body. Actually I have far more problems with 3-body than Helliconia, but I'll leave that to the end.

In Helliconia Star B 'Batalix' has a long comet-like orbit around star A 'Freyr'. It's closest approach is 230 AU, it's furthest 720 AU. For comparison the distance between the Sun and Pluto is about 39 AU. Freyr is a massive hot star of about 14 solar masses, Batalix is slightly smaller than the Sun. The planets that orbit Batalix are all in the range 0.3-1.3 AU.

So Helliconia is relatively tightly bound to Batalix, so it seems to me, on first glance, reasonable that the seasons 1) work the way they do 2) are regular. But, over time regular orbits of Batalix around Freyr could continually nudge the orbits of the planets, leading them to go into different orbits - actually probably getting ripped off and sent into deep space. However Aldiss gets round this by:

Making his binary star system very young. Batalix was captured by Freyr a million years ago - virtually no time at all in astronomical terms. So the 'nudges' that might take the planets around Batalix into other orbits have had barely any time to act on them.

----

For the 3-body problem, Alpha Centauri's stars orbit at between 11-35.6 AU between each other (AB). Planets have been detected in the system, although it should be pointed out that the best evidenced planets are around Proxima Centauri (C), which although gravitationally bound, only gets at closest ~4200 AU from the main pair. Currently sits about 12,000 AU away.

Planets with life orbiting C seem reasonable. They seem less likely to be impacted by AB as they are quite a distance away. Planets around AB are certainly possible, but I think only if they are pretty close to their parent stars. Planets further out in the main system would likely be flung out by the stars motions.

So where are the Trisolarians in this system? The book seems to imply that their around AB somehow. But that's going to be a very bad place for life to thrive in (never mind an actual civilisation develop.) I don't buy it as viable. They could be around C...but then they probably wouldn't be experiencing the huge changes in climate that they experience.

TL;DR Aldiss' Hellicania makes more sense that Cixin's Alpha Centauri from the viewpoint of its planets and life. :giggle:
Yes I think in TTBP the Trisolarians are around AB which is why they are so desperate to find a more hospitable planet (Earth) but I agree the extreme biology as described in the three body problem 'computer game' seem pretty unlikely. It's hard to image in reality how evolution could manage to operate in environments with such extreme swings in climate. I think in Helliconia's case rather than evolve the 'diseases' that adapt them to survive the next cycle, the original capture would likely have been a major extinction event at least for higher order life.
 
I think in Helliconia's case rather than evolve the 'diseases' that adapt them to survive the next cycle, the original capture would likely have been a major extinction event at least for higher order life.

From my reading, I think the approach of Freyr before the capture was very much gradual rather than abrupt, giving the planet's biology a little time to adapt to the new conditions. (And Freyr at its furthest seems to revert Helliconia back to it's pre-collision settings.)

The plague effecting the 'humans' I do think was a nice touch. It seems like the sort of thing that might evolve on such a planet. A bit like sickle-cell anaemia having protective properties against malaria, but still being a terrible disease.

However, surely the humanoids that are impacted by the plague, would they not evolve for it to be more and more non-lethal over time? Possibly there is just too much time and many generations between the two great year occurrences of the plagues for immunity to get a hand-hold?

I probably should have added to the sentence 'unpredictable extreme swings'

That's a great point, planets that survive the AB system are ones that are basically in quite secure and stable orbits, the planet of the Trisolarians seems to be going on an adventurous chaotic wandering. I think it makes more sense that a planet that is kicked around in Alpha Centauri because it is a bit too far out of its parent star is more likely to be ejected from the system and just freeze over.
 
However, as for the orbital mechanics...I don't know if Aldiss got his system checked out with a proper simulation. (There should be some sandboxes that might be able to test it today.)
It's mentioned in the acknowledgements that he received help and advice on the world of Helliconia (including its geology and weather) as well as cosmology and astronomy from various scientists. He also says (interestingly) that Lovelock gave him permission to use his Gaia concept.
 
If I can add one more positive thing to look out for. You've got to read it just for Aldiss's long list of short euphemisms for sex. Don't worry, no vast bad sex paragraphs here, just some hilarious one liners.
Well, then I really must read this book. A bit of vocabulary expansion is always a good thing. :lol:
 

Similar threads


Back
Top