Wow it's been so long since I've been able to contribute here!
So far (July and last week of June, I'm kinda cheating there
) I've read some new stuff and revisited some old friends.
Colleen McCullough:
First Man in Rome
Steven Erikson:
Gardens Of The Moon
Jasper Fforde:
The Eyre affair
Ian Irvine:
A shadow on the Glass
Kate Forsyth:
The Tower of Ravens
Kate Forsyth:
The Shining City
Lynne Truss:
Eats, Shoots and leaves.
I was actually only finishing
First Man in Rome, as I had started it at the beginning of the year and couldn't finish it before uni started. It was a great read, however I found it a bit too long... Or maybe too detailed, or something. I'm not sure, but there is something there which detracts from the experience for me. Though it was great to have started it before I started my course on that period of Rome
I enjoyed
Erikson, still havn't read the next book yet. This was yet another on my hit list that I finally caught up to. I think I've lost the momentum though, as I got distracted by other books.
Jasper Fforde, what can I say? A must read for anyone! Always a fan.
Ian Irvine was thoroughly dissappointing. I actually attempted to read this book when I got it almost five years ago now, but I lost interest. I thought I'd return now that I'm older, see if it was any better. I must say, I'm so sticking to my try-before-I-buy line. The characters were fairly stock, though the idea of a chronicler as a main character had potential. The world is cardboard, it doesn't come alive really, this story felt like one of those dreams where you can never really see your surroundings or the people around you with any clarity. Besides which, the majority of the book is a series of long, arcuous flights. I really hate those parts
of stories. The constant trek of Frodo and Sam through Mordor was my least favourite part in LOTR. I mean, an author should really ask themselves, does this add anything to the story or character development? In some cases it does, it may be extremely crucial to a character or event. But in this case it doesn't. Urgh. He could have condensed the vast majority of this book into a few pages and it would have been better off. But still not brilliant. I'm not going to follow this up.
Upon reading her new series, I am reminded of how much I LOVE
Kate Forsyth. Her writing is just so animated (especially in comparison to Irvine). The world of Eileanan is the one fictional location that I love always, its almost like it exists on its own outside the plot. If I was given the choice one day to be able to go to any place I desired- past, present, future or fiction, this world would be it. Other authors and works I love, but none has captivated me like the world Kate Forsyth has created. I found this new series/ tale a lot harsher and more frustrating (in terms of plot and sympathising with the characters) than her first series: everything that could go pear-shaped, does go pear-shaped. She also really challenges you in giving you a main character with so much potential who you can't help but empathise with, and then having her kill and maim a loved character from the first series. All in all, I could hardly put these two books down (I havn't been sleeping too well lately
) and can't wait for the next one next year.
Eats, Shoots and Leaves: Well, this is just a classic, and it can't go wrong to touch up on the basics whilst having a good laugh. Plus its brief: I decided to return to it to pass the time until the new Harry Potter came out
I can't control my reactions every time I read from this. I just love it.
So that's what i've been reading the past few weeks, and I'm on to
Potter tomorrow. Holidays! Don't you love them? I only have one week left now though....