Terry Pratchett lays into JK Rowling!

Agree with person above. They already tried to start a similar war between JKR and Neil Gaiman, as they both created a young wizard boy with green eyes and black hair. The facts that one was in comics for adult and other in books aimed primarly at kid and that one was created 10 years before the other didn't stopped them.
 
JK was a bit thick, but TP was right., as for the point about authors supporting each other, I always thought that Anne McCafferty's greatest fantasy was believing she could write.
 
im sorry i think the woman is an ignorant pig i always have done ..her books are not 'edgy' you canf ind exact replicas where she clearly stole her ideas from pritty much and so therefore terry i applaud thee

an JK rowling nice i havent read seen one interview with her where she doesnt come across as pretentious and up herself... she contradicts herself when discussing her personal life and claims originality where none exisists

SHes written the same un original a book however many zillion copies there are and i HATE adults who call it great reading for youths ..so damned patronising if you ask me
 
Last edited:
Apparently she doesn't live too far away from where I live - she's just up the M90 in Perthshire. Shame I don't know anything more exact, or I could try and set up an interview. :)
 
CarlottaVonUberwald said:
im sorry i think the woman is an ignorant pig i always have done ..her books are not 'edgy' you canf ind exact replicas where she clearly stole her ideas from pritty much and so therefore terry i applaud thee

an JK rowling nice i havent read seen one interview with her where she doesnt come across as pretentious and up herself... she contradicts herself when discussing her personal life and claims originality where none exisists

SHes written the same un original a book however many zillion copies there are and i HATE adults who call it great reading for youths ..so damned patronising if you ask me

I could not agree more! I can't stand the woman, she's so up herself! I saw her on Richard and Judy and I was yelling madly at the TV for her to shut up, and they were encouraging the woman! I wanted to shake her!
 
CarlottaVonUberwald said:
im sorry i think the woman is an ignorant pig i always have done ..her books are not 'edgy' you canf ind exact replicas where she clearly stole her ideas from pritty much and so therefore terry i applaud thee

an JK rowling nice i havent read seen one interview with her where she doesnt come across as pretentious and up herself... she contradicts herself when discussing her personal life and claims originality where none exisists

SHes written the same un original a book however many zillion copies there are and i HATE adults who call it great reading for youths ..so damned patronising if you ask me

Don't beat about the bush, Carlotta; come out and say what you really think!:D
 
I said:
Apparently she doesn't live too far away from where I live - she's just up the M90 in Perthshire. Shame I don't know anything more exact, or I could try and set up an interview. :)

I'm not a big Rowling fan, but I would read with great interest an interview conducted by someone who knows fantasy and isn't egging her on to make dismissive pronouncements about the genre.
 
I'm trying to forget she lives in Perthshire, I just pray hard her Computer doesn't break down as I'm the poor sod who'll have to fix it. I enjoyed her books and can't wait for the next one, but someone PLEASE gag her until she has read enough fantasy to form an honest opinion.
 
Tell you what, if she does come in, I'll tie her to a chair with the boss' tongue (he worship's her) until she consents to give an interview.
 
Teresa Edgerton said:
I'm not a big Rowling fan, but I would read with great interest an interview conducted by someone who knows fantasy and isn't egging her on to make dismissive pronouncements about the genre.

she doesnt take much egging for a self professed non fan...
 
Call me cynical but are TG and JKR worried that if they came out and said their books were fantasy then they would see sales drop and less cash in their pockets? Surely not!
 
Now i turned 15 on the 31st (i know Jk's birthday) and the Hp books DO NOT! make children read all they read is HP and think all other reading is "gay" etc

Now ive read adult fiction GRRM, RJ, Pretchet etc and the Hp books had nothing to do with it I personally find the books really childish i mean a teenage boy v a older more experienced and knowelegable guy and all his minions like what the hell?

and whats this about not being a fantasy book? she lives in a world of her own.
I also hate all the HP merchindise. Dosent she have enough money?

In conclusion HP is **** on other authors boots =D

Now im gonna go and watch waynes world =D
 
In search of forever said:
Call me cynical but are TG and JKR worried that if they came out and said their books were fantasy then they would see sales drop and less cash in their pockets? Surely not!
I think they're more worried that if they're identified as Speculative Fiction writers, then media and mainstream writers will look down upon them. Which is basically a correct assumption, as far as I can see.
 
Let's be honest as an attack it has all the damage potential of your mother's moistened hanky. It is really time Rowling wrote a new press statement for the chat circuiits, she was saying the same thing when Potter first hit the news and I would happily accept that she did not think she was writing a fantasy.

Early stories bears more relationship to Enid Blyton's Famous Five, or perhaps a Dorothy Sayers whodunnit, than fantasy. Now, I would tend to consider them closer to the bitterness of Tom Brown's School Days.

The fact that she has set them in a 'magical' surround merely adds a classification for indexing. It does not necessarily make the story a fantasy as far as the writing is concerned.

Sadly, looking at the shelf of her books, she does appear to be picking up one of the more distressing trends of current fantasy and fiction writers; that of having little to say and a lot of space to say it in.
 
ray gower said:
The fact that she has set them in a 'magical' surround merely adds a classification for indexing. It does not necessarily make the story a fantasy as far as the writing is concerned.
But what is Fantasy then, if not stories set in Fantastical environments?

I see Fantasy as a over-genre that simply encompasses everything that's not possible, and will never be, in the reality that we percieve.
 
Thadlerian said:
But what is Fantasy then, if not stories set in Fantastical environments?

I see Fantasy as a over-genre that simply encompasses everything that's not possible, and will never be, in the reality that we percieve.

To actually quote my mother from a number of years ago when she asked me what type of books I preferred reading and I replied Fantasy she said that all works of fiction are fantasy as none of it is real and therefore it is fantasy
 

Similar threads


Back
Top