Green
Sick and Tired
Ok, this thread raises the question:
If a movie is expected to be bad, but it exceeds those expectations, does that make it good?
In the pro corner... I thought Sky Captain would be utterly dire, but it wasn't. Hence, I was pleasantly surprised (even though it was still bad).
In the con corner... Army of Darkness was pretty good if you weren't expecting a horror. But it was actually not very good at all.
So - which is more accurate? Does low expectations = better movie, or is class a non-arbitrary thing?
Answers on a postcard...
EDIT - in fact (while I'm in rant mode), is there anyone else that thinks the whole "it's so bad it's funny" argument, when applied to most films (specifically crappy, dubbed martial ats films), just doesn't wash? I mean, in my opinion, if it's bad, it's bad.
If a movie is expected to be bad, but it exceeds those expectations, does that make it good?
In the pro corner... I thought Sky Captain would be utterly dire, but it wasn't. Hence, I was pleasantly surprised (even though it was still bad).
In the con corner... Army of Darkness was pretty good if you weren't expecting a horror. But it was actually not very good at all.
So - which is more accurate? Does low expectations = better movie, or is class a non-arbitrary thing?
Answers on a postcard...
EDIT - in fact (while I'm in rant mode), is there anyone else that thinks the whole "it's so bad it's funny" argument, when applied to most films (specifically crappy, dubbed martial ats films), just doesn't wash? I mean, in my opinion, if it's bad, it's bad.