The site
Tower of the Hand: An Encyclopedia of Ice and Fire has the lists for all the POVs by book... just click on the books on the right side.
I revived this thread to pick up on a link to a blog. The post is called Through the Eyes of a Child and it is referring to
The Most Boring Blog You'll Ever Waste Time On and it's entry ...and his is the song of ice and fire.
Here's an excerpt...
Maybe if GRRM used Catelyn as sparingly as Daenerys, she'd be a more effective character, although I realize that Catelyn is usually in a unique perspective to observe events of interest. I'm sure we could come up with a few other POVs for that. I mean, wouldn't at least one Robb chapter have been alright?
Of course, he could just give Rickon a single line chapter like Faulkner did in
As I Lay Dying. I always think of that book when reading these, as it's the first book I can remember that used this narrative style of pure first person stream of consciousness with multiple POV characters and one for each chapter. It's one I liked when I first read As I Lay Dying, and one I particularly like for this series. (Although in retrospect, I realize that technically, Martin uses limited third-person and not first-person like Faulkner.)
In particular, I think it works so well and is refreshing for the fantasy genre. Martin's characters feel like real people on the whole. Yes, several do super-human things, and the kids seem to grow up exceedingly fast, but overall, the characters have real flaws and real strengths. There are very few characters that actually fit a stereotype. On the whole, the fantasy genre was too inspired by Tolkien.
That's the meat of the blog entry.
Do you think Robb should have had a POV? What about Rickon?
I personally feel that Robb was portrayed correctly by Martin. Robb was not the central story. In most every fantasy series I've ever read, the characters of Robb and Eddard are the undisputed conquering heroes of prophecy. Well, not this time.
What is the story? Ice and Fire. We're still not exactly sure what that means... Jon? Jon and Dany? R'hllor and The Other? Stannis and The Other? Direwolves and Dragons? The secondary story, although it appears to be the primary story, is the struggle for the Iron Throne. The major players are Robert, Cersei, Eddard, Littlefinger, Varys, Tywin, Tyrion, Jaime, Joffrey, Myrcella, Tommen, Stannis, Renly, Olenna, Mace, Margaery, Balon, Euron, Victarion, Robb, Doran, Walder, Roose, Viserys, and Daenerys... plus hundreds of lesser pieces in this grand game of thrones.
Of the actual kings and claimants (Robert, Joffrey, Tommen, Stannis, Renly, Robb, Balon, Euron, Viserys, Myrcella, and Daenerys) only Dany has her own POV. Not even Maester Aemon had his own POV. I think Martin does this intentionally to keep the story at a more personal level... less lofty. We see all of these through the eyes of their lieutenants and families... very interesting. Martin is able to keep mysteries going and going by not showing us the minds of Stannis, Euron, and Robb. In contrast, the only things we know of Dany is the vision she has of herself. We might see Dany in a totally different light if we'd been going off Jorah's POV the entire time.
Giving Robb a POV would have demystified him. Would it have been interesting to have been in the Whispering Wood or in Jeyne's bed when Robb received word of his brother's deaths? Sure, but the tension is heightened to get news of these events from Catelyn's perspective. In my opinion, the four teenage POVs from Sam, Sansa, Jon, and Dany are more than enough.
As for Rickon... we might get a POV from him... he's still young. We waited until the second book to get Theon's POV, until the third book for Jaime's, and until the fourth for Cersei's.