I think I'd agree that the first book is not rip-roaring action from cover-to-cover, but as I've said elsewhere, I see the "trilogy" as really one very long book, not a first book with two sequels, so there is a lot of scene setting and character-showing going on (some of it not at all obvious).
I would say that the third volume is the best of them, but looking back at all three as a whole: a fine achievement for any writer, not just a debut writer.
I would say that the third volume is the best of them, but looking back at all three as a whole: a fine achievement for any writer, not just a debut writer.