Rowan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2000
- Messages
- 2,286
Originally posted by Highlander II
my question to them would be- 'are you guys out of your minds?' -- the series is one of the most popular sci-fi programs on tv
oh -- and as far as your fic goes CynVision -- you could always make it an AU fic that says Jack was a pilot -- in AU - just about anything goes ---
Originally posted by Rowan
a serious marathon writer who would end up crashing the main frame by discovering all by herself the concept of a self modifying code loop with no exit.
Originally posted by CynVision
I think they fought hard for the choices they made in the movie. From what I heard in the commentary, the studio was urging them to pick up the pace so much that the scene with O'Neill and Skarra would have been left out of the theatrical version. They fought for that one hard so that it was clear how Skarra had the lighter in the rescue. The movie is rather good at making you feel for the characters. At least some of the time they wanted to paint them an extra dimension and make the audience care.
I think the movie VS. TV guys have the sort of relationship the kids in Jurassic Park had.
"If I do, what will you give me?"
"Respect."
AU isn't something I've tried. I'm a bit scared of it. Not to knock it or anyone happy using a AU but what's running through my head is "those who can do, those who can't cheat." I'ts a cheat I can't bring myself to fall back on. I'm very real with my approach to fic. I'm a writer wanna be and that's my hopeless delusion. As I keep reading stuff on sites I'm seeing I'm going to have to change some stuff. If there isn't a place anywhere saying he's a pilot I'm sol on that angle and it'll be a challange to get it to fit in. Or, leave it alone and as confusing as the show.
Originally posted by Rowan
Do either of us have a life? Seems like we've spent the last few hours here.:disturbed
29 hours and counting. Sleep is gonna come hit me soon... I hope.
I'm sure that it keeps the movie sales at a steady rate.Originally posted by Highlander II
i love the concept - but the movie just seemed to be a 'lead in' to something bigger - (which, ironically it was - the SG-1 series) -- but, i still don't understand why the PTB of the movie do not want anything at all to do w/ the series -- i believe the series may have inspired some ppl to go out and watch the movie - some who wouldn't have initially watched the movie - know what i mean??
Originally posted by Highlander II
'what would 'character' be like if he/she had made this decision instead -- alternate reality - on its own - not where someone touches the mirror and 'sees' - and a parallel that involves the same subject in the 'alternate' reality -- this, i would consider a writer challenge, and not a cheat -- b/c writing the same story from 2 very different POV's and 'angles' (sorry, can't think of a better word) - would be one heck of a challenge --
Originally posted by CynVision
I'm sure that it keeps the movie sales at a steady rate.
I've heard this about the 'movie being a launch' before. They could be bitter more of the screaming fans of SG-1 didn't hit the box office. And, I still think it's because movie people look down on the TV folks. They can see TV as limiting. Tiny sets, cheating and tricking viewers instead of going on a real location shoot. Different unions. The legal 'red tape' of getting actors and staff from stage to TV to a movie, and vice versa, can be sticky sometimes. I think SG-1 side stepped the issue by locating in Canada. It's no accident there's a pack of Vancouver natives on the cast.
I'm not sure just when the commentary was recorded. If in first season of SG-1 the movie storywriters, who were the director and producer, may have had some mixed feelings giving up the idea? Quite quickly they had two paper backs out based on the movie. And, if you look at the first season of any show the writing waffles as the style and tone of the show are found. they could have been upset with the direction things went. They sure didn't like them killing Kolwalsky off. They mentioned towards the end of the DVD that a sequel would have had Kolwalsky in a bigger role. But again they could have liked the actor enough to have favored him that way.
It's a bit amusing that at one part in the commentary the producer laughs a little and notes that they still use the gate dialing graphics used in the movie on the TV show.
Yes. Quite a challange. Got to keep it fresh while for the second retelling... One thing that I found with the casual fic reader is if you do a POV they're like "Why is it 1st person?" That was a reaction I had to the first SG-1 fic story. I gave the link out to a chat room guy and he's all confused. That first fic is told from O'Neill's point of view. I'm thinking 1st person is not 'in style' writing form right now. Or, I messed it up somehow.
Originally posted by Rowan
I'm not the one to ask. I seem to be superglued to this keyboard.
As for AU vrs canon. Actually everytime we 'create' a story, we're right on the edge of AU. When I wrote a piece about Jack and his feeling about the holidays I went AU because I gave him a past ['Holidays' Gateways #2]. When I wrote about Daniel after his finially finding the harcesis child in 'Maternal Instincts' ['Son Light' on the lists] I had to get inside his head and make a guess at how he'd feel. Or Kasuf after Daniel left Abydos and went back to Earth ['Good Son' Potporri #2].
When we build stories, we make alternitives. Now, most of us, me at least, try to keep them as close to canon as possible but since canon is constantly unfolding [the fun of writing for an on-going seris vrs one that has ended] you never know what's next.
The fun of being a writer.
Originally posted by Highlander II
well- POV doesn't necessarily mean 1st person - you can do a Jack POV in 3rd person - it's kinda tough - b/c you have to remember that you're not writing in an omniscient style, but it can be done --
1st person is hard - it takes practice and a little skill to pull it off - and many characters are strong enough to support a 1st person POV (jack isn't one of those not strong enough characters, but there are some) --
Originally posted by Highlander II
you are right there, Rowan - if the series is still going on - we are sort of creating AU each time we write -- but, the fun there is seeing what the PTB do w/ 'their' version of events - no matter what we (fic writers) have come up with -
Originally posted by CynVision
I went over all the different levels of POV a few months ago and have forgotten them. I get a bit nervous using words like "omniscient." I just know a few different styles and yep, it's a right pain to have to keep in mind who's viewing, feeling and if I'm giving anything away with a narrative. I think that's my approach. I think I'm so departed from any proper English structure. I've forgotten it all. Yep, I'm an editor's nightmare.
Jack isn't a good canidate for 1st person?
Originally posted by Rowan
Depending on the type of story and the character I find 1st person actually easier to write.
I love writing Jack. I've served under CO's like him, worked alongside firemen, policemen and emergency med folk like him. The personality is clear and sharp with deep undercurrents. Sam, I can't write her to save my soul. Don't know why. You'd think being a military female, it would be easy, but it isn't. I think I've done one Sam piece in all my time writing.
It's always a challenege to put words in her mouth and have them sound right.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
P | Help me? | Book Search | 0 | |
U Tube help | Technology | 1 | ||
K | the clay cursed boy unknown title need help | Book Search | 1 | |
K | the defender of the old women cant remember title need help | Book Search | 0 | |
B | (Found) Wracking my brain to remember a book. Please help | Book Search | 2 |