Originally posted by webmouse
It is JUST A TV SHOW. Sit back and enjoy -- or don't. The loss is yours.
Yes it is "just a T.V. show", but with science fiction it still has to have its own internal reality and integrity to give it credibility. Loss of that credibility renders it unwatchable for the most part.
Please -
please - note, this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with either of the actors.
It also has nothing to do with the character of Daniel and his absence. It has
everything to do with plain common sense. So for the moment,
forget Daniel; he's out of the picture.
Concentrate instead on the people whose job it is to select a fourth team member. I'm not an expert on the American military system, but I wouldn't expect a lowly - and somewhat wayward
- colonel to have the right of veto over whom he has assigned to his team. I'd expect his opinion to be canvassed and to be taken into consideration but (and correct me if I'm wrong here) I would think that the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the Pentagon would have the final say in the matter.
Now, we know from 'Proving Ground' that the S.G.C. has its own selection procedures, so it is clearly canon that they don't take any Tom, Dick or Jonas from a less advanced planet and with no relevant qualifications and stick him in S.G.-1, no matter how fast he can read or how long he can hold his breath under water.
On top of this, Quinn cannot keep his head in a crisis - and I'm not talking about the explosion here but its aftermath.
When the chips were down, he colluded with the scientists to blacken the name of the guy who saved not only his life but the lives of millions of people. He clearly hadn't thought it through very well...
The high ranking advisor to the High Minister tells one story and the scientists, who have to cover up their ignorance and incompetence to save their jobs, tell another. And the High Minister is going to believe their tale rather than his advisor's account? Yeah, right!
Further to that, having come clean about it - which would have involved admitting he'd lied in the first instance - he does a runner to the Tau'ri. Again, he hasn't thought it through very clearly...
He's met a small number of Tau'ri who, logically, have been chosen for their ability to make their country look good besides all their other skills. A bit like car salesmen then.
He knows nothing about the Tau'ri except what they've told him. For all he knows, their 'High Minister' could be someone like Saddam Hussein who would hand him over to the N.I.D. and use the naquadria to make a bomb to destroy Colona. And he's played straight into their hands!
All in all, not a very dependable person to employ in the defence of our world.
And the stupid thing is that the whole sorry mess could have been avoided if Quinn had been written as a believable character - another member of the S.G.C.'s anthropology department who'd worked alongside Nyan and Robert Rothman for instance. He would then have been able to have taken the moral high ground as Daniel was wont to do and, as a demonstable moral bankrupt, he was unable to do, thus forcing Jack to take on that role. Incroyable!
As you say, it was my loss, hence my great dissatisfaction with the implausible way Quinn was introduced and the appalling character he was given.
Best wishes,
Hatshepsut :wave:
--