Re: April's Astonishing, Astounding (and Sometimes Overpowering) Adventures in Readin
I liked GOTM much better by the end than I did in the middle. In the middle, I was bored or confused a bit, but I recognized that Erikson was trying something very different from the farmboy epic. The last half of the book really captured me, as the buildup in the first half of the book really was worth it.
I actually find Erikson and Janny Wurts very similar in this regard. They seem to spend the first half of the book building, and then POW! the reader gets paid in full for their patience. The resolution of the book's crisis is complete (if not necessarily satisfying), and occurs before the end of the book, but then a deeper threat is exposed that pulls the reader along to the next novel. However, Erikson doesn't appear to tie his novels as closely together as Wurts does, which is fine with me.
If one does not expect this kind of structure, frustration can set in, and you wonder what goose trail the author is leading you on. Now that I know this is what Erikson does, and that it is what Wurts does, as a reader I know that I am NOT being led down a goose trail, and it makes the book much more enjoyable. I will re-read GOTM sometime and see if the experience is different now that I know Erikson does things this way. I also think that this kind of structure is the reason why a lot of readers got frustrated with The Wars of Light and Shadow, back in the 1990's.
If a reader persists with either of these writers, the rewards are really handsome. Martin, by contrast, does not structure things this way. Stuff gets resolved all the way along (often in a way the reader doesn't want), which is quite a different structure altogether.
I am into chapter two of DHG, and so far, I am pleased. I just wish I could stay awake longer at night in order to read the darn thing. By the time the kids are in bed, I'm pretty much a zombie!