Book Covers

Re: Judging a Book by its Cover

Some books don't need anything except a cover:

scan0117.jpg
 
Re: Judging a Book by its Cover

And here's a few from my own collection that I adore - all these books are outstanding; content is served very well by presentation, and they are simply consummate examples of book art:

Clarke-Bomb.jpg
scan0020.jpg


Moorcock-EnglandInvaded.jpg
 
Re: Judging a Book by its Cover

I like the original War of the Worlds cover, about the only one I've seen that gives some attention to the aliens inside the tripods.
 

Attachments

  • War_of_the_Worlds_original_cover_bw_opt.jpg
    War_of_the_Worlds_original_cover_bw_opt.jpg
    67.2 KB · Views: 213
Re: Judging a Book by its Cover

You can't judge a book by its cover but you can judge whether you want a book by its cover. I used to buy books for cool covers all the time. Still do when I can afford it. I came to books from comics. Good covers never seemed a problem. If it's okay not to like them it should be okay to do the opposite.

Nice collection of MORE THAN HUMAN artwork.
 
Re: Judging a Book by its Cover

Nice idea for a thread. One of my favourites has always been the Pauline Baynes cover for The Lord of the Rings.

Ever since I was a kid, I've been intrigued by the characters at the edges and in the corners; and I've always loved landscapes that fade into blue distance for the desire to explore they invoke, which works particularly well in fantasy.


LotR_book19681.png

That IS a really cool cover! Is it a hardcover or paperback? I've been saying I'd love a bare bones copy of LOTR minus all the appendices and the like... if they can fit GRRM novels into one copy, surely they can do LOTR as one convenient mass market copy.
 
Re: Judging a Book by its Cover

That IS a really cool cover! Is it a hardcover or paperback? I've been saying I'd love a bare bones copy of LOTR minus all the appendices and the like... if they can fit GRRM novels into one copy, surely they can do LOTR as one convenient mass market copy.

It was a paperback cover back in the 70s, probably UK only (publisher George Allen & Unwin). You can sometimes find them on eBay, but it would have UK spelling. (And the only one I could find just now was pretty expensive.)

I don't think anyone would ever publish LOTR without the appendices, but there have been plenty of one-volume paperback editions. (Amazing to think the whole of LOTR including appendices takes only a bit more space than ADWD.)
 
Re: Judging a Book by its Cover

It was a paperback cover back in the 70s, probably UK only (publisher George Allen & Unwin). You can sometimes find them on eBay, but it would have UK spelling. (And the only one I could find just now was pretty expensive.)

I don't think anyone would ever publish LOTR without the appendices, but there have been plenty of one-volume paperback editions. (Amazing to think the whole of LOTR including appendices takes only a bit more space than ADWD.)

True, but they tend to be larger than mass market and kind of unwieldy. I think I did the math once and LOTR without the appendices is about the same length as ASOS.
 
Re: Judging a Book by its Cover

I think any book >600 pages is unwieldy. I definitely prefer LOTR as three volumes.

Another favourite, though not (all) SFF -- and I just found out they're making a film of it!

cloud-atlas.jpg


(Strangely, I can't find a pic of my first-printing cover, which has pale blue instead of green and looks better imo.)
 
Re: Judging a Book by its Cover

A couple of covers that I can't stand:

a-game-of-thrones.jpg


Dreadful. Terrible font with a tired drop-shadow over a Photoshop color-transition background, and a boring looking icon in the center. Looks like it was thrown together as a placeholder, and then once the book got published they forgot to update it. It actually reminds me of a web page someone might have made in the late '90s or something. And that the series continued with these terrible designs is all the more baffling. When I first picked this up I thought to myself, well, I hope the book is more thoughtful and well-made than its cover is...unfortunately, I didn't find that to be true.

12.lumley-necroscope.jpg


n17178.jpg


When I was reading these two books, I couldn't bring myself to read them in public. Just terrible, uninspired, juvenile nonsense. The books weren't any better, either.
 
Re: Judging a Book by its Cover

I love the paperback covers for Joe Abercrombie's books, but they are best enjoyed in the flesh - lovely thick textured card, digital images don't do them justice:

51Ji7V7z-cL._SL500_AA300_.jpg


My LotR paperbacks were bought in the late 70s and have covers that use art by the man himself (this is the original - it was wrapped around the book as a cover):

art-tolkien.jpg
 
Re: Judging a Book by its Cover

One of the few modern SF covers to really get it right:

5138NH56DGL._SL500_AA300_.jpg


It expertly captures Simak's pastoral style, downplaying the SF elements and enforcing the rural, Americana vibe of the novel's protagonist and setting.

I also really like these two versions, although they are vastly different:

WayStation%28Simak%29.jpg


waystation-500x500.jpg


This is another book that I collect in every version I can find.
 
Re: Judging a Book by its Cover

Thanks, harebrain, but I found it online just after I hit "submit" on my post. Doh!

Ha ha, and now the prematurity(?) of your post is immortalised in mine!

Seems odd that they used an illustration from The Hobbit as a cover for LOTR. Were all three volumes' covers pictures from the earlier book?
 
Re: Judging a Book by its Cover

No, they used "The Halls of Manwe" for The Two Towers (not the whole thing, just the base of the mountains and the sea):

hallsofmanwe_Tol.jpg


and I'm still trying to find the other one - they're not credited inside the paperback at all, even though they're proper George Allen & Unwin editions. It looks like maybe the Misty Mountains - peaks with a dark bird flying over.

I think they just chose sections of JRR's artwork that fitted the books - FotR does focus on getting to Rivendell, after all.
 
Re: Judging a Book by its Cover

The cover's just a lure. I'd say 75% of books are bought on a gut instinct.
 
Yeah, I'm bumping this thread too in case D Davis missed it. Sorry for any self-aggrandizement this implies.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top