Dusty, just realised I'd forgotten to respond to your piece.
I liked the story, which hit theme and genre squarely, and it was in my very short shortlist. I don't know much about Rip van Winkle, other than he slept for a long while, but that was enough. I only got the link from the last words of your story, so it acted a bit like one of my twist-in-the-tail entries, and when I re-read it I saw the clues you'd planted earlier which I enjoyed on an intellectual level. However, it didn't quite grab me enough for the vote. I agree pretty much with everyone above -- it was a little too bare in its setting/context for me, and with no emotional appeal it needed to be perfect to get the intellectual vote.
Hugh's point about time lag/losing pace hadn't occurred to me in those terms, but I had noticed a kind of vague over-wordiness in it, as if you wrote it in a rush and, pace Jane Austen, you didn't have time to make it shorter. Looking at it properly now, to my mind it would have benefited from much of the "What would you feed it?" paragraph being dumped, and going straight into returning it at once, without the delay of taking it to school. You could still have had the slorts giving it whiskers, as the children could have said something about feeding it before the adult says it has to be returned.
So good idea, but not quite up there with your best work.
I liked the story, which hit theme and genre squarely, and it was in my very short shortlist. I don't know much about Rip van Winkle, other than he slept for a long while, but that was enough. I only got the link from the last words of your story, so it acted a bit like one of my twist-in-the-tail entries, and when I re-read it I saw the clues you'd planted earlier which I enjoyed on an intellectual level. However, it didn't quite grab me enough for the vote. I agree pretty much with everyone above -- it was a little too bare in its setting/context for me, and with no emotional appeal it needed to be perfect to get the intellectual vote.
Hugh's point about time lag/losing pace hadn't occurred to me in those terms, but I had noticed a kind of vague over-wordiness in it, as if you wrote it in a rush and, pace Jane Austen, you didn't have time to make it shorter. Looking at it properly now, to my mind it would have benefited from much of the "What would you feed it?" paragraph being dumped, and going straight into returning it at once, without the delay of taking it to school. You could still have had the slorts giving it whiskers, as the children could have said something about feeding it before the adult says it has to be returned.
So good idea, but not quite up there with your best work.