If I'm being honest, at this stage I'm writing it for myself. I don't want to bore any chronners here who've heard me bang on about this WIP for the past 9 years, but ... I deleted an entire historical era (arguably the most 'important') and other bits and pieces when I started realising this book was going to be a monster. The Victorian era is now set aside and I have a loose idea to write a follow-up book set in the distant future using the Victorian era and what-not in
that.
I have to admit also, I'm not a fan of series - or serialised - narratives and the only reason why I considered a second book was because I thought a supernatural horror set 500 years in the future, yet also linking to Victorian England, would be a refreshing spin on gothic haunted house/land horror tales. Otherwise I'd've just left it at one book.
I've only had a little bit published here and there, say six or seven shorts in a literary journal, and a contribution to a small-press horror antho.
Thanks for your interest, it's lovely of you; what are you writing?
@Dan Jones I know, I think up till last year I was doing exactly that - tinkering - (and I think
@Jo Zebedee works like that, too) and then I had so many problems with
'flow' that I decided to just write and clean things up in the mix. In that regard, the periods of 1178, 1347 and 1761 are much cleaner than present day which is the last part I've written. As I'm writing, I have a little blue exercise book (looks the size of rent book!) and I'm making written notes in that to address on the fourth pass 'Why aren't the police asking Willie XYZ?' which means I can get a sense of the book's pace without stopping and starting.
As far as publishing, well, I don't now. I mean, I'd love that, but I was always writing it for me I guess. We'll see. It's very
you to ask that, dahling
.
Thanks for the comments, all.
pH