Okay, I've found this a useful exercise on other sites and, whilst we don't have the anonymity here that works well elsewhere, I think the principle still applies. The question is, very simply, where would you stop reading and why?*
I've put up a start of an old one of mine that I might return to as an example. I'd suggest limited the excerpts to about 500 words. Put them up. This isn't a crit, it's a single question. Where did you stop?
The idea behind it is that agents/editors get loads of stuff sent to them and yours has to hook someone well enough to read on. I've heard 250 words mentioned as the amount you have to do it in. So, this might go someway to saying if your first 500 has enough to engage?
*I have found this process pretty brutal in the past, so if you're in any way worried/easily dented by criticism, this process mightn't be for you.
Anyhow, next post I'll stick up mine, and people can see if they think the process is one that will benefit them.
I've put up a start of an old one of mine that I might return to as an example. I'd suggest limited the excerpts to about 500 words. Put them up. This isn't a crit, it's a single question. Where did you stop?
The idea behind it is that agents/editors get loads of stuff sent to them and yours has to hook someone well enough to read on. I've heard 250 words mentioned as the amount you have to do it in. So, this might go someway to saying if your first 500 has enough to engage?
*I have found this process pretty brutal in the past, so if you're in any way worried/easily dented by criticism, this process mightn't be for you.
Anyhow, next post I'll stick up mine, and people can see if they think the process is one that will benefit them.