I thought the problem with FTL was that an object approaches the speed of light it gains mass. At the speed of light of attains infinite mass.
Really? I'd thought that had been confirmed a long time ago. Isn't that what the particle accelerators are proving?The group I spoke about found they had only "came close" to the speed of light. There was no mass gain.
Sounds a bit like the film Interstellar.
Didn't see it.
Exactly. It had only came close to the speed of light.I believe that subsequent measurements found errors in the recording equipment that gave false results.
Exactly. It had only came close to the speed of light.
How small objects (eg. pens, nuts, washers) I've set down on some convenient surface tend to vanish the moment I take my eye off of them, never to be seen again. Could I get a grant to study this?
My friend TJ is looking over my shoulder mumbling something about "yankee professors".The group I spoke about found they had only "came close" to the speed of light. There was no mass gain.
Sure, if you want to get all cozy with the pilot, a member of the a sluglike species having having "as much sex appeal as a road accident,"
But most of the media reports are wrongSpooky Action At A Distance
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
T | This NASA Tool Lets You Track Asteroids And Comets In Real Time | Science & Nature | 0 | |
O | Advanced Toilets | SFF Lounge | 20 | |
S | (Found) Condensation droplets change scientists' physical characteristics | Book Search | 6 | |
Slow Bullets by Alastair Reynolds | Reviews & Interviews | 0 | ||
Green bullets | Science & Nature | 0 |