I'm resurrecting this thread. One of the things first mooted was that this sort of funding didn't suit individual authors, yet
I noted on Kameron Hurley's website she links to Patreon. This, despite making 50k at writing last year (according to her own figures.) which shows that some writers are finding it working for them). There does not appear to be a backlash. It seems to becoming the accepted way to go forwards - as if those who don'd are missing out on the current trend.
I find myself in two minds. On the one hand, I'd like more time to write and, like most of us here, that time is squeezed amongst work and life. But, I have great support out there and would, perhaps, be the sort of writer who could benefit from something like this.
But it feels wrong. It feels like taking before I've worked for it. It feels like asking individuals to pay my wages, instead of the outcome of my graft. I also wonder if, as a trend, it's coming close to saturation. (To be open and upfront, I don't support others through crowdfunding, but buy their book instead. There are so many, every day, on every platform, I'm being asked to donate and I simply can't.) I'd hate for anyone to feel they Should support me, even if they are stretched to do so.
But, on the other hand, money does trickle down from it via writers to cover artists, to copy editors etc. It does, perhaps, provide income the arts need and a new business model.
On the other side of the coin, I have applied for grants to support my writing (but know it is unlikely they'll go to genre writers in NI) and have no problem with that) and wonder why it feels different.
I find this a real dilemma, one that is relevant to all of us, given the prominence of crowdfunding. My head says I should look into crowdfunding more closely. My heart says no. Mostly, though, I trust my gut.
But what do others think? Am I mad not to go for it? Or right to listen to my instincts?